Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
openvix development cycle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sonnetpete" data-source="post: 880630" data-attributes="member: 310216"><p>Ok, granted there are a lot of changes on this image....but I'm not so sure that I'll be upgrading to the next iteration when it appears. For the moment, I'm happy with my original Solo and have no wish to change to a Solo2. From what you've said most of the image development is going into the newer boxes which is probably as it should be. </p><p></p><p>But, I feel there is limit to what you can expect a Solo to do. In a way it's like upgrading to Windows 8 and expecting it to run on a 10 year old computer. I'm sure the lack of processing power and memory inherit in a Solo are taken into account but developers should be wary of packing too many additional features into a Solo image that a Solo user may neither need nor ever use. Yes, there is no compunction to download a new image if the one you are using is working ok, though there is a persuasive thought that you will be 'left behind' if you don't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sonnetpete, post: 880630, member: 310216"] Ok, granted there are a lot of changes on this image....but I'm not so sure that I'll be upgrading to the next iteration when it appears. For the moment, I'm happy with my original Solo and have no wish to change to a Solo2. From what you've said most of the image development is going into the newer boxes which is probably as it should be. But, I feel there is limit to what you can expect a Solo to do. In a way it's like upgrading to Windows 8 and expecting it to run on a 10 year old computer. I'm sure the lack of processing power and memory inherit in a Solo are taken into account but developers should be wary of packing too many additional features into a Solo image that a Solo user may neither need nor ever use. Yes, there is no compunction to download a new image if the one you are using is working ok, though there is a persuasive thought that you will be 'left behind' if you don't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
openvix development cycle
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top