Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nadal liu" data-source="post: 1030758" data-attributes="member: 401837">Thanks for your reply.&nbsp; I think what you suggest is a good way to go.&nbsp; To use zinwell ms and quarto lnbs.&nbsp; It should work on most of the Japanese stbs. However, I have a stb called satella s2, which is like dreambox in Europe in its network &quot;capability&quot; and it doesn't allow changing LO to 10600.&nbsp; It allows 11300 and 11200 as well as 10678.Is there any model or brand of quarto lnb that you recommend?&nbsp; I actually randomly purchased two quarto lnb of eBay before and the signal strength I got was worse than my 11300 quad lnb.&nbsp; Maybe I should go ahead and request a feature to set lo to 10600 in the satella s2 forum.&nbsp; Then I can go ahead use quarto lnb and zinwell ms.&nbsp; The current way of using modified emp centauri ms, I am worried it might cause harm to my stb as it involves modification of the electronic component to work in a way not intended to.&nbsp; Maybe I am too concerned.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nadal liu, post: 1030758, member: 401837"] Thanks for your reply. I think what you suggest is a good way to go. To use zinwell ms and quarto lnbs. It should work on most of the Japanese stbs. However, I have a stb called satella s2, which is like dreambox in Europe in its network "capability" and it doesn't allow changing LO to 10600. It allows 11300 and 11200 as well as 10678. Is there any model or brand of quarto lnb that you recommend? I actually randomly purchased two quarto lnb of eBay before and the signal strength I got was worse than my 11300 quad lnb. Maybe I should go ahead and request a feature to set lo to 10600 in the satella s2 forum. Then I can go ahead use quarto lnb and zinwell ms. The current way of using modified emp centauri ms, I am worried it might cause harm to my stb as it involves modification of the electronic component to work in a way not intended to. Maybe I am too concerned. [/QUOTE]

Verification