Recent content by popolon

Is this receiver firmware release notes (during 2018) lying about 27.5w support?

It somehow follows, but is still different through whole day. Here is two day snr graph (green line is 11023H):

Is 11023h on astra 2f, because I get at morning different snr graph related to astra2g 10964/11068/11097? Or what could affect that?

You meant Astra 2A is moving towards 28.0/28.05? at least according to SES center of box webpage.

Would 2g or 2f move to 28.35?

So eutelsat webpage was actually right, and 28.5 slot is again used. But not by 2g, but 2e.

11009v has still some signal, but now level with 2g uk.

Maybe after 11009v data signal move, SES puts high power 2g europe signals into 10979v, 11009v, 11038v, just to complicate fringe reception.

That can be used without multiswitch, but then you get only that one fixed polarity/band into which you connect the cable.

Just to have no doubt, have there been different spec Inverto Quad BU LNBs manufactured? That patent was filed on Date of filing: 30.03.2012 , so from what year was your LNB manufactured/bought?

In my case isolation shuold be then 50db, due to 11009V. Have you compared the Invacom Quad/Quattro with that Inverto, and seen clear better cross polar isolation in that Inverto BU quad/quattro? Shuold we have separate topic, or is there already about these cross polar isolations?

So why is inverto saying only 22 db minimum in their product webpage?

Well, then SES also keeps this myth alive, stating that 2g location is 28.2/28.5, http://www.ses.com/4628824/astra-2g

But satellitecalculations seems to show wrong 2f/2e/2g future movement. Those cannot be used as evidense, as those predict future, and that has not happened when i have previously checked what this site predict for normal orbit slot, e.g. for 2f .

So why does eutelsat webpage still says 28.2/28.5, if 28.5 location is not even used anymore?