[Quote] ''On the other hand perhaps I’m wrong. Perhaps we ought to have a little more censorship… perhaps all direct shots at goal should be edited out of football (to prevent over excitement / beer spillage etc)''
************************************************** *************
I think that was taking your thread a bit too far Paul...as you where actually saying that ''It be so much more convenient if
Sky were to broadcast xxx R18 content? Instead of extra dishes''..... I feel that a direct shot at goal is not quite the same as a direct shot over the face...as some guy dumps his sacks over some well paid whore!......with out wishing to offend you further more, my feelings are that the ITC/Ofcom have got things right as far as censorship goes with UK TV......Have you ever stopped to think that many of us on this site actually enjoy buying CAMS erecting dishes etc...as Satellite tv of this nature becomes an enjoyable hobby and not just pointing the remote to switch on the Digibox!....the added bonus is..yes we can watch porn if we choose (and there are people on here that do!) but also view other channels FTA which
Sky would just instantly charge extra for, on top of now which is a staggering £40.00 PM!....(40% of my council tax) you may feel that people involved with this side of Sat TV are nerds for being involved in such gadgets when a Digibox without the extra equipment could be the answer.... but I speak for all of us here that along with learning and the headaches it is a good hobby and helps to slow down the monopoly of Rupert Murdoch's empire (or should I say his daughter)....I shudder to think without the Satellite equipment sold today the majority of us here would be subscribing to
Sky TV...and what kind of wealth and power
Sky would then have?