Between the 2 i would say this
.cccam
- very stable on nds on hop1
- very bandwith hungry be prepared for a few gigs\month
- very good speeds on hop1, instant, all providers
- not very compatible with high speed downloads, lost of breaks in nds, fine on the others
- really hates lag, the fewer peers you have the better, on my box 30 peers runs smoothly
- can be harder to setup, depending on your particular needs, it has lots of options and settings to play with
- can't have cccam on XP
.6b0x
- fast
- not as realiable as cccam
- low bandwith consumption
- sucks in nds, good on the rest
- instant speeds on seca, nagra
- not as picky with dists, dist2 almost as good as dist1 on most providers (excluding nds)
- lag is not such a big issue as ccam
- can't handle nagra3 as well as cccam
If 6b0x were as stable and as good on nds and n3 as cccam there would be no need for the later. A few things might be missing on this comparison but i think it can give you an idea of what to expect.
Go for cccam.
__________________  When people ask me what I think, I tell them: "I think all of the meat around the pig's ass is pork." |