View Single Post
Old 25-05-2009   #7
PaulR
Dazed and Confused Mod
 
PaulR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 28-06-2003
Location: Wirral, NW England
Posts: 3496
Thanks: 1
Thanked 89 Times in 86 Posts

My System: Various digiboxes, broken Nokia 9800S, numerous analogue boxes. My lovely little lappy, HP Omnibook 6100

When the TV signal is processed to compress its size for transmission the video component takes more time to process than the audio and there is always a slight, barely noticeable, lag between the two. There is also more delay intoduced in the receiver when it processes the complete signal back into separate video and audio.

The brain normally compensates but this can be seen if the camera position is behind the head of someone who is talking. It then becomes more obvious. You can see this quite a lot on the morning breakfast programmes.

If you've got a fancy TV set with lots of image enhancement then this also takes time and the lag between the two becomes too much. The TV will then have an audio output, as Rolf says, which will take into account the extra sound delay. Using this will be the best you can hope for unless you have a very expensive AV amplifier. These often have an adjustment for audio delay.

PaulR
As I get older I find myself thinking about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.
PaulR is online now   Reply With Quote