Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2004   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by Channel Hopper
as you say - what the viewers want

Who do you ask ?

Those already on a subscription system without pornography ?
Those with subscription to an existing offshore erotic channel ?
Those that can view foreign TV within the UK and receive additional erotic channels by any means ?
A general proportion of the whole of the UK satellite and non satellite viewing public ?

Without checking ALL the above options, its impossible to find if a R18 channel (or greater) is likely to be favourably viewed, for the purpose of checking how far the content would be deemed
1) suitable for all
2) enough to satisfy
3) profitable for the provider
4) likely to succeed when pitched in with the competition
5) continue to be profitable

One supplier of satellite goods in E London is always promoting 'new' hard core channels from satellite, all of which seem (allegedly) to have similar content and are in most ways contain content able to morph into each new channel.
Who do you ask? - Why does it matter? Why not let the market decide? If it’s not what the viewers want they won’t subscribe and the channel will either go bust or return to softcore. Softcore channels could continue as now. Rember I am talking of subscription only services.
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004   #27
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

[QUOTE=waverider]
my feelings are that the ITC/Ofcom have got things right as far as censorship goes with UK TV......Have you ever stopped to think that many of us on this site actually enjoy buying CAMS erecting dishes etc...as Satellite tv of this nature becomes an enjoyable hobby and not just pointing the remote to switch on the Digibox!....the added bonus is..yes we can watch porn if we choose
Was that the Royal "we"? I have heard of some interesting reasons why we should have censorship, but censorship to promote a hobby is a new one on me. Perhaps there are a lot of enthusiasts here but spare a thought for the rest of us! Why should you have to be a sat TV enthusiast to watch hardcore? I would agree with you regarding Merdoc and Sky but censorship is not the proper method of control. Ofcom should seriously look at breaking up Skys monoploy of the satellite airwaves.
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by Razor
There are channels waiting in the wings for any sign of weakness from the censures, they have the content and are ready.

In some cases it will be cheaper for them as now they have to cut their SHOTS so to speak in order to stay within the guidelines at present. These are by and large, well run channels, and very good at what they do, they have been on the SKY platform for a long time. Some of the newer additions to the SKY platform may not be well run and here in lies the dilemma for the regulators ( can they open the flood gates with these channels around ), the answer = NO.

Then there is the unknown quantity….The Friendly TV’s ( Babecast ) of this world, channels like this have been pushing the limits for some time now. What would these channels do if the shackles where loosened, I for one hope things stay as they are and no hardcore is allowed on home TV.

There are places to go if one wants HC, those who really want it will find it, and those who do not, will never see it even by accident.
Why do the places to go if one wants hardcore have to be foreign services?

I must emphasise I am talking about *specialist subscription channels* here. The channels you specifically pay for and know what to expect when you do, the channels that it is not possible to “accidentally see”, the channels that you have to enter a PIN number before you can see any explicit content. I am *not* asking for xxx on free to air services!



There is no reason why free to air services should not remain much as they are now and nothing to prevent the regulators from continued enforcement of this. What would happen if they pushed the limits? First a warning, second a big fine and third loss of broadcasting licence - the end of Friendly TV and not much of a contest. There is also nothing to stop existing softcore services from continuing with softcore if they are so popular with the viewers. There is also no reason why all services should have to meet the same standards. Different viewers on different services will have different expectations so different standards are not unreasonable.



All that is being asked for is consistency. Consistency with the BBFC and consistency with foreign subscription channels. If hardcore is so harmful why didn’t the Government proscribe Satisfaction TV when the ITC asked them to back in 2000?
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #29
Irish Mod
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: 30-09-2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1313
Thanks: 0
Thanked 40 Times in 5 Posts

There is a thread running in this section by pornlover, read it and see how hard it is to subscribe to one of the foreign HC channels.

Most kids know more about our Digiboxes then we do, so I still feel it would be all too easy for them to access a HC channel on a Digibox.

Also if just one of these SC channels goes HC, they will ALL have to, nobody will watch SC when the next channel in the EPG is showing HC.
I still stand by my statement ….That I hope things stay just as they are, and no HC is available on home TV.

There is more than enough HC on hotbird 13E to keep everyone happy, you just need to work to get it. As for being foreign, I do not think this is true, Spice Platinum is owned by the Adult Channel. They show the same movies the Adult Channel only the explicit stuff is left in.

It is easy to say that the regulators are infringing on my RIGHT to view HC if I wish to do so. They might say that in their view controls on the Continent are far to liberal ( French, Dutch, Spanish ) and this is GB after all. I say all you need to do for HC is pick up the phone and be prepared to do a little leg work, that may be beyond the average teenager.

Don't mind my spelling
Razor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #30
Member
 
Join Date: 10-01-2004
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by waverider
Totaly agree about the Sky bit m8 as it was Sky I was attacking for ripping people off!....but I hate to deflate you we also get footy and porn over here, providing you have a satellite sytem that is........and a lot of it is free!
pls explain ?

not on topic but i've bought a few sat mags and i don't know anything about them. I used to have an old analogue receiver and 2 lnbs back in the good old days when astra was 4 satellites on the same orbit and everything was for free, MTV just launched in europe and sky movies was called premiere had cable before that when sky consisted of 1 channel. lol
billy the goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #31
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

Originally Posted by billy the goat
pls explain ?

not on topic but i've bought a few sat mags and i don't know anything about them. I used to have an old analogue receiver and 2 lnbs back in the good old days when astra was 4 satellites on the same orbit and everything was for free, MTV just launched in europe and sky movies was called premiere had cable before that when sky consisted of 1 channel. lol
Well Basically m8 you only have to explore this site to see what can be viewed by installing a good motorised system...There are thousands of channels although a very large percentage of them are in foreign languages, and many of them are encrypted. However most movies that I have viewed have been US!...As for the Premiership Football I can suffer the Commentator speaking words I cannot understand when I am receiving better coverage than Sky broadcast's...
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #32
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

Originally Posted by Paul Tavener
Was that the Royal "we"? I have heard of some interesting reasons why we should have censorship, but censorship to promote a hobby is a new one on me. Perhaps there are a lot of enthusiasts here but spare a thought for the rest of us! Why should you have to be a sat TV enthusiast to watch hardcore? I would agree with you regarding Merdoc and Sky but censorship is not the proper method of control. Ofcom should seriously look at breaking up Skys monoploy of the satellite airwaves.
My apologies Paul a mere slip of the tongue (we....meaning most people on this site!) but then again you dont have to be a sat enthusiast to watch hardcore!..as it is I beleive legal to view in your own home on a CD or Video tape!
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #33
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9287
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Why only 'view' ? taking part can be just as much fun (but more messy)

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #34
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

Lol..perhaps Pornlover or Razor could be the one's for advise!...E'h hopper? :-)
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #35
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by Razor
There is a thread running in this section by pornlover, read it and see how hard it is to subscribe to one of the foreign HC channels.

Most kids know more about our Digiboxes then we do, so I still feel it would be all too easy for them to access a HC channel on a Digibox.

Also if just one of these SC channels goes HC, they will ALL have to, nobody will watch SC when the next channel in the EPG is showing HC.
I still stand by my statement ….That I hope things stay just as they are, and no HC is available on home TV.

There is more than enough HC on hotbird 13E to keep everyone happy, you just need to work to get it. As for being foreign, I do not think this is true, Spice Platinum is owned by the Adult Channel. They show the same movies the Adult Channel only the explicit stuff is left in.

It is easy to say that the regulators are infringing on my RIGHT to view HC if I wish to do so. They might say that in their view controls on the Continent are far to liberal ( French, Dutch, Spanish ) and this is GB after all. I say all you need to do for HC is pick up the phone and be prepared to do a little leg work, that may be beyond the average teenager.
"Most kids know more about our Digiboxes then we do"

No I don’t think so Razor. Firstly the broadcasters should be forced to get proof of age such as paying by credit card. Then there’s the PIN, if you don’t tell them the PIN they won’t be able to access the service. It’s as simple as that. Of course if you do then they will. The same also applies to foreign services and R18 video - if you don’t keep them locked away then the kids will see them. Do you realy believe that kids subscribe to adults channels without their parents knowledge?

"Also if just one of these SC channels goes HC, they will ALL have to"
True. The reason is that is what people want to watch. So why not let people watch what they want?

"the Continent are far to liberal ( French, Dutch, Spanish )"
Yes the French, Dutch, Spanish, Danish, Belgian, Portuguese, Greek, Polish, Italian and Swedish regulators must all be wrong far too liberal - thank God we have Mediawatch and the jolly old British Government to protect us from sin. What a splendid job they do

Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #36
Member
 
Join Date: 10-01-2004
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

"Yes the French, Dutch, Spanish, Danish, Belgian, Portuguese, Greek, Polish, Italian and Swedish regulators must all be wrong far too liberal - thank God we have Mediawatch and the jolly old British Government to protect us from sin"

About Mediawatch - after all these are adult channels and nobody is under any obligation to watch them - adults may watch them if they want to (by dishing out money) but one may use the parental lock if one is offended by the SC and the free to air trailors of HC. this choice would still be there for viewers to use as mature adults even if Mediawatch was dissolved. it all is a matter of personal choice and freedom to choose what u want to watch and to take full responsibility for your choice. if Mediawatch was to allow HC as FTA and i were to watch it i certainly would not say that i watch it because Mediawatch allows it but i would say i watch it because i choose to watch it and i would take full responsibility of my choice.

Originally Posted by Paul Tavener
"Most kids know more about our Digiboxes then we do"

No I don’t think so Razor. Firstly the broadcasters should be forced to get proof of age such as paying by credit card. Then there’s the PIN, if you don’t tell them the PIN they won’t be able to access the service. It’s as simple as that. Of course if you do then they will. The same also applies to foreign services and R18 video - if you don’t keep them locked away then the kids will see them. Do you realy believe that kids subscribe to adults channels without their parents knowledge?

"Also if just one of these SC channels goes HC, they will ALL have to"
True. The reason is that is what people want to watch. So why not let people watch what they want?

"the Continent are far to liberal ( French, Dutch, Spanish )"
Yes the French, Dutch, Spanish, Danish, Belgian, Portuguese, Greek, Polish, Italian and Swedish regulators must all be wrong far too liberal - thank God we have Mediawatch and the jolly old British Government to protect us from sin. What a splendid job they do

pornlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-01-2004   #37
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

On the other hand Paul why wait!.... it could be years before HC can be legally televised on Sky, it will probably cost a lot too.....if you really want to watch porn on tv now then buy a motorised system, the cost of it is cheaper than a years subscription to Sky!
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2004   #38
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by pornlover
if Mediawatch was to allow HC as FTA and i were to watch it i certainly would not say that i watch it because Mediawatch allows it but i would say i watch it because i choose to watch it and i would take full responsibility of my choice.
Pornlover, yes I would agree, although I don’t think that Mediawatch would be in favour of hardcore, because they are a fundamentalist Christian pro-censorship activist group (sorry if I confused the issue with my sarcasm. BTW The anti censorship group is called Ofwatch).
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2004   #39
Member
 
Join Date: 10-01-2004
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

it's a shame paul that censor groups have not learnt a lesson from what is happening in 3rd world countries. there they have very strict censorship codes (iam not going into the reasons for that) but people still see what they want to. what is happening is that they get all their HC from pirated DVDs and Videos leading to a massive boom in piracy. now i am talking big money witha a turn over to the tune of millions of pounds annually and there is nothing that the censor groups can do there. this is cutting massively into the genuine companies dishing out HC to make a decent profit in a legal way. the analogy i am trying to draw is that we are paying foreign companies money right now to watch HC and as i gather by the threads in this forum more and more people and following suit. if uk censorship codes allowed HC selectively then this money would have remained in the UK and at the same time made life a lot easier for everybody. tell me if i am wrong.
pornlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2004   #40
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by pornlover
it's a shame paul that censor groups have not learnt a lesson from what is happening in 3rd world countries. there they have very strict censorship codes (iam not going into the reasons for that) but people still see what they want to. what is happening is that they get all their HC from pirated DVDs and Videos leading to a massive boom in piracy. now i am talking big money witha a turn over to the tune of millions of pounds annually and there is nothing that the censor groups can do there. this is cutting massively into the genuine companies dishing out HC to make a decent profit in a legal way. the analogy i am trying to draw is that we are paying foreign companies money right now to watch HC and as i gather by the threads in this forum more and more people and following suit. if uk censorship codes allowed HC selectively then this money would have remained in the UK and at the same time made life a lot easier for everybody. tell me if i am wrong.
pornlover you are not wrong. That is yet another reason why Ofcom ought to let the viewers in the UK have the consistent proportionate and joined up regulation of television services that they deserve. Why should we have to pay foreigners to supply us with services when we have the capacity to provide them for ourselves?
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-01-2004   #41
Member
 
Join Date: 10-01-2004
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

u have hit the nail on the head paul - well said !
pornlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2004   #42
Member
 
Millard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 28-01-2004
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

That's the whole point behind Restricted 18 dvds. THEY'RE RESTRICTED.
Millard.
Millard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-02-2004   #43
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

Well I have to say that although I have mixed feelings on this subject, I will admit however that our close european neighbours dont seem to have the scale of child abduction as we do here, perhaps legalised porn could be a good thing in one way to eliminate these sick needs!
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-02-2004   #44
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Originally Posted by waverider
Well I have to say that although I have mixed feelings on this subject, I will admit however that our close european neighbours dont seem to have the scale of child abduction as we do here, perhaps legalised porn could be a good thing in one way to eliminate these sick needs!
Waverider, yes true the UK appears to have one of the highest rates of sexual offences in Europe as well as the strictest censorship... strange that.

I have recently heard from a reliable source that Ofcom have been discussing R18 standards with the BBFC. Nothing public or offical yet but I think it's interesting as they are now in the process of rewritting the ITC programme code (public consultation due in the summer). There have also been some interesting developments on some of the domestic channels recently.
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-02-2004   #45
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

Well as I work with children I would welcome any change in the law that changes things here. Yes perhaps if porn was legalised then just maybe child abduction might decline......BUT! the regulators would have to be carefull on the type of content with these films etc.....and would'nt it be a good day for England if perverts changed to the heterosexual needs of normal human beings!
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2004   #46
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 19-02-2004
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Who wants to watch R18's anyway?


R18's are the new softcore.


Stick with the european channels.
war head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2004   #47
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Warhead, what content do you like in the continental services which is missing from R18? I didn’t think the difference was that great. Although I can’t confess to having seen much foreign material, I did catch a few hours in the late evening on two business trips last year one to Italy and one to Sweden, didn’t seem that different from R18 to me, but it was a very small sample. What's different?
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2004   #48
Salty Tech Monster Mod
 
waverider's Avatar
 
Join Date: 17-11-2003
Location: South East England
Posts: 1539
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts

My System: TM-5400 CI+USB Super. Cryptik Digital H-H Mount. Diablo 2.3 Light. Cas 3+

@ Paul Taverner small sample as in what m8?
waverider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-02-2004   #49
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 19-02-2004
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wink

Paul, as a "hardened" porn expert like myself, (ha ha ha); you would no doubt appreciate some of the more extreme material available on european satellite channels, with a surprisingly inexpensive system (when compared with the cost of a stack of over-censored & over-priced R18 DVD's) As far as i am aware, there are a few dedicated channels offering more extreme content on non-Sky digital satellite, the others can surprise you sometimes though, so get yourself "porned up" with a fairly basic system, m8.

Last edited by war head; 23-02-2004 at 11:10 PM.
war head is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-02-2004   #50
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-2004
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by war head
Paul, as a "hardened" porn expert like myself, (ha ha ha); you would no doubt appreciate some of the more extreme material available on european satellite channels, with a surprisingly inexpensive system (when compared with the cost of a stack of over-censored & over-priced R18 DVD's) As far as i am aware, there are a few dedicated channels offering more extreme content on non-Sky digital satellite, the others can surprise you sometimes though, so get yourself "porned up" with a fairly basic system, m8.
War head I would agree with you about the cost of DVD’s, a subscription service would certainly provide much better value for money. As for the content being more extreme on European satellite channels I might well appreciate them, but I might not, you didn’t explain what the difference was.



(Waverider remember that sample size is always relative)
Paul Tavener is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
adult, broadcasting, ofcom, r18


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 PM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1