Nagra 2: Boxkey Experiment | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| | #1 | ||
| masta h4ck3r Join Date: 20-04-2005 Location: CENTRAL UNITED STATES
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: fta fortecstar w/panset progg installed : AMD sempron 1.6 256ddr | got something worth the while to shoot out there just a little food for thought as follows : Nagra 2: Boxkey Experiment Backgound: In our previous experiment we discussed the CONTROL words used in Nagra 1 and Nagra 2 and proposed a "thought" experiment whereby one could conclusively determine if the CONTROL words are the same for both streams. We introduced the IDEA encryption algorithm and suggested that this is the cryptographic technique used with Nagra 2. Without attempting the actual experiment, we concluded based on bandwidth considerations alone, that the same MPEG-2 stream is being used for both Nagra 1 and Nagra 2 (i.e. - the provider would be foolish to use twice as much video bandwidth to transmit the same pictures to us---satellite bandwidth costs hundreds of millions of dollars). Based on this, we concluded with a great deal of certainty that the CONTROL words (which are used to "put together" the decoded MPEG-2 packets) were the same. Of course, with Nagra 1, we know that the CONTROL words are encrypted using the cryptographic algorithm called DES. We also know the Key0 and Key1 which is used with DES. Thus, we have no problem decrypting the CONTROL words for the Nagra 1 stream. What about the Nagra 2 stream? We surmised that the NAgra 2 stream uses the encryption algorithm known as IDEA with different keys, namely IKey0 and IKey1 which are unknown to us, but must reside somewhere in the EEPROM of the Nagra 2 cards. But why are we justified in assuming that IDEA is the encryption being used for Nagra 2? The answer is that "this is what the experts" think! Not good enough...we need to be absolutely certain. We need to prove this! The following experiment will help us make sense out of the Nagra 2 encryption being used and also shed some light on the location of the boxkeys used by Nagra 2. Requirements: -a subbed Nagra 2 system -a Nagra 1 system -two dataloggers; one for Nagra 1 setup and 1 for Nagra 2 setup -copy of: "Applied Cryptography", By: Bruce Schneier (IDEA is outlined on page319 / DES is outlined on page270) Experiment: Okay, we know from Nagra 1 that before the card gives the CONTROL words to the receiver for processing, it encrypts them using DES and the receiver's 8 byte boxkey. This is the same boxkey you all enter into your ROM cards, etc. This occurs when a command $13 is issued. It is very likely that Nagra 2 encrypts the CONTROL words using IDEA before it sends them to the receiver. But, what does it use for the boxkeys? The same boxkeys as the Nagra 1 cards? Remember, IDEA requires a keylength of 16 bytes, whereas the original boxkeys we all know about are only 8 bytes long. If we knew what boxkeys are being used for Nagra 2, then theoretically, we could decrypt both the CONTROL words for Nagra 1 and NAgra 2 and compare to see if they are the same! If they are, then we have found the boxkeys used by Nagra 2, confirmed that 16 byte IDEA is being used and are well on our way to decrypting Nagra 2 video. Clearly, the 16 byte boxkeys being used must reside somewhere on the receiver firmware. We can easily dump the firmware and store the hex values in a text file. Now, write a high level C program that implements the IDEA algorithm. See Schneir for the mathematical details -- the coding should be straight forward. Next, write a routine that takes 16 bytes from the firmware dump and tries to use that as the boxkeys for Nagra 2. Try decrypting the Nagra 2 CONTROL words and see if they match the ones we know from Nagra 1. IF they don't match, try different bytes from the firmware dump. Keep trying! Most likely, the boxkeys for IDEA will be near or adjacent to the serial number of the card in the firmware! Also, compare the dumps of 2 different subbed Nagra 2 systems (with the exact same subscription). Where the dumps differ is most likely the location of the boxkeys! Before you can try this, you will need to log the NAgra 1 and 2 streams and tune into the same channel simultaneously. Log a few command $13 packet responses and their corresponding Nagra 2 responses SIMULTANEOUSLY. If someone is willing to do this and post it for us, it would make it a lot easier to proceed with our Boxkey experiment! Feedback from all the experts in this hobby would be greatly appreciated! Good Luck! | ||
| | |
| | #3 | ||
| Regular Member Join Date: 07-07-2003
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Thi is all BS This post was orginally made months ago,by someone that didn't know much about N2,so there is lots of errors in that post. I hate whn someone takes time in copying and pasting without knowing things fully,so even when the post is wrong,they still continue poting. If you want to know facts about nagra 2 a litle more,go to cardcoders forum,this will teach you most of that experiment is compeltely useless. And also the post from al7bar forum about the "diamond" receiver is completely a marketing strategy. ROLFW,please consider to be carefull about this posts copyed from other sites,which have many errors,like this one, and are promoting sales. Get instructed about nagra 2 by reading cardcoders,so this lame and uninstructed posts do not sow up in your forum. Thanks. | ||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Retired Moderator Join Date: 22-12-2003 Location: Brighton
Posts: 5155
Thanks: 4
Thanked 46 Times in 14 Posts
My System: Dreambox 7000, Skystar2 | Thanks giver, we know all about both of the things you mention, but we like to give people plenty of leeway here. We don't like to censor people; we would rather let other posters put the record straight. We're also not adverse to a bit of gossip and rumour. We don't insist that everything here is proven fact. It's a pretty light-hearted discussion and support forum. Anyone who's been around the block knows the score. I'm fairly new to the sat scene but these things stick out like a sore thumb. Regards. | ||
| | |||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| boxkey, experiment, nagra |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Matrix Reloaded 1.1 - Nagra Boxkey question | Vargas | Matrix Reloaded, Revolutions and CAS interface | 0 | 24-08-2004 10:29 PM |
| Where do I put the IRD and Boxkey in the Titanium? | jagost02 | Cards & Programmers General | 3 | 07-03-2004 02:41 PM |
| Nagravision (with selectable BoxKey) | milkey | Matrix Reloaded, Revolutions and CAS interface | 7 | 03-03-2004 09:33 PM |
| Conax 4.00 e and nagra... | tunte | Conax, Cryptoworks, Nagravision, NDS and Others | 2 | 25-01-2004 12:29 PM |
| Problems with 30W Nagra? | rolfw | Matrix Reloaded, Revolutions and CAS interface | 0 | 29-09-2003 12:01 PM |