Different receivers?Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
Different receivers?Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Member Join Date: 28-07-2007 Location: kent, uk
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: sky+ |
Can anyone tell me the difference between a Sat Catcher Voyager 3 box and a Technomate 1500 and also which one is the better? The Sat Catcher seems more expensive but i've heard the Technomate is the better box? Regards, Lee | ||
| | |
| | #2 | ||
| Believe it when I see it Admin. Real name: Rolf Join Date: 01-05-1999 Location: Southern England
Posts: 29871
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1098 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5 My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser. | Unfortunately very few members will have used both receivers, so don't expect a flood of replies. I have used both and in my opinion the Satcatcher is a superior receiver, but the Technomate has more support on software patches. | ||
| | |||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Super Nutty Mod Join Date: 03-10-2003 Location: Essex
Posts: 1399
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
My System: Technomate TMS-1500 CI+ "patched" receiver, 90cm p/f 36v motorised dish, Inverto C120 0.3db LNB, Moteck V-Box 2, Packard Bell 6052 XP Home computer, Toshiba A60 laptop, and lots of Russian Vodka ! | The Technomate is easy very to use, never used a Sat Catcher so cant say. The Technomate has both, as for the Sat Catcher look for the specs. | ||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| receivers |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |