Nanoxx Na9600ip

***homerjay*** · 10-08-2007

anybody had any experience of this receiver.

looks very much like innovative, but with more shared channels.

**Topper** · 10-08-2007

I can only refer you to the following post
http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/627428-post3.html

***homerjay*** · 10-08-2007

cheers topper.

ive found a forum, but a little wary of something that nobody seems to have.

**rolfw** · 10-08-2007

I'm always concerned with automatic internet updates for standard receivers, as it normally doesn't take too long for them to be closed down.

Are you still receiving updates on the Innovative?

***homerjay*** · 11-08-2007

yes i am. it works a treat.

but always on the lookout for more more more.

shaktoo · 07-09-2007

Hello homerjay,
I was wondering how is the nanoxx & the innovative working for you...which one would you recommend as i am thinking of buying either a inetbox( which is clone of DM 500S uses the same images etc) innovative or nanoxx9600
my current sysytem has few digiboxes as well as a nokiadbox2 and powersky 15000 an Arion clone which i ma in the process of hooking up.will appreciate your views. thanks

shaktoo · 07-09-2007

sorry double posted hence edited...Also I have in posession a Multifeed dish which is a take on Wave Toroidal... and will be setting that up for 30W/24.5W/7 or 5W ( whichever imprint i can get on 85cm)13E and maybe 16E ..I will have to sacrifice either 30 w or 19E/28.2... as been told wont be possible on one dish...i am unsure about 28.2 as I already have sky dish with quadLNB and 3 digiboxes set up for that.If my experiments are successful and wife factor pleased then will get the ok for maybe a DM 7025 or a twin tuner PVR...

***homerjay*** · 07-09-2007

Originally Posted by shaktoo

Hello homerjay,
I was wondering how is the nanoxx & the innovative working for you...which one would you recommend as i am thinking of buying either a inetbox( which is clone of DM 500S uses the same images etc) innovative or nanoxx9600
my current sysytem has few digiboxes as well as a nokiadbox2 and powersky 15000 an Arion clone which i ma in the process of hooking up.will appreciate your views. thanks

i never bought the nano, but the inno is still working a treat.

the OSD is very poor, but as far as opening channels go, its VERY good.

to be honest, id only have it as an 2nd box because its usability is so poor.

shaktoo · 07-09-2007

so you would recommend dreambox 500 and maybe nanox as a second ....one last question about the autoupdate of nano... does that mean it connects itself to its preferred server and downloads and autoupdates keys etc etc ...?

***homerjay*** · 07-09-2007

Originally Posted by shaktoo

so you would recommend dreambox 500 and maybe nanox as a second ....one last question about the autoupdate of nano... does that mean it connects itself to its preferred server and downloads and autoupdates keys etc etc ...?

i dont know much about the nano, but he inno updates keys when new software is available to download i think. but keys change so quick these days then you end up doing it manually anyway. better off with a dreambox for that i reckon.

shaktoo · 07-09-2007

thanks for clarifying that... by the way.. if you wish to get rid of the Inno.. i would offer my services ...would you be interested?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Nanoxx Na9600ip Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)