Evaluation Of In Line AmplifierInformation exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
Evaluation Of In Line AmplifierInformation exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Toute Ronde Bon Oeuf Real name: Gordon Join Date: 29-05-2009 Location: North Yorks Moors
Posts: 1801
Thanks: 42
Thanked 166 Times in 160 Posts
My System: Triax 1.1m and Orbital 80cm Motorised Dishes. Various fixed Dishes. Eclectic selection of Digital and Analogue Receivers. Complex switching and distribution that SWMBO cannot fathom. Nor me. |
Being one of those who always advocates the theoretical line whenever Satellite IF Amplifiers come up on forum, yet also being aware that the practical experiences of some don't, on the face of it, match the Theory, I forked out 3 Yorkshire Groats for a Chinese made 13-18dB Amplifier from Ebay Recap: The Theory is that despite low noise components being the norm nowadays, the Amplifiers will add a modicum of Noise of their own, so can only really be used to compensate for losses on long cable runs. They can only attempt to recover a little of what was already there and was lost. What they cannot do is compensate for the absence of signal at source. Only a bigger Dish can achieve that. (We are still talking Theoretically here - I have read the reports from others both here and elsewhere which seem to gainsay the theory .........) The Tests: Fitted this at various places along the cabling to my 1.1m Motorised Dish. ie At the LNB, At the Motor, At the Receiver. The Constraints: My cable run is not "long", being less than 10m. The Results: Sadly, the theory is fully borne out. The device passes power and Motor Control signals as promised. The Signal Strength on weaker but stable TPs went up eg from 60 to 70, from 70 to 80 etc. Quality was scarcely affected. A Couple Of Anomalies: 1. Where a TP was marginal on Quality, the Amplifier effectively blocked it (Not a dicky-bird)! This occurred consistently and I eliminated "finger trouble" on my part. 2. Transferring the Amplifier to my 80cm Motorised Dish threw up similar trends except the Signal Strength went down by 10 points or so! After some head-scratching, I swopped my Receivers around and discovered that my Kaon behaved as you'd expect and showed the desired increase in indicated Strength. But the Silvercrest SL65 seemed to register a decrease which I put down to over eager AGC. That conclusion, whilst possibly wrong, is reinforced by the fact that the massively strong TPs from various Satellites especially Astra 2 and Atlantic Bird 3 indicate relatively low Strengths on the Silvercrest, though moderate TPs seem ok. The Kaon again behaves as you'd expect if attached to the same Dish etc. So I've proved very little but had a decent few hours fa**ying about! Anybody need a cheap Amplifier? | ||
| |||
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tivů For This Useful Post: | Robbo (11-10-2009) |
| | #2 | ||
| Member Real name: Kelvin Join Date: 04-01-2009 Location: southcoast uk
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: tecnomate 5600 CI USB super / 5500 ci super/ 1500ci super dragon trex cam, several dead cards sky subscription and box 1.2 metre motorised dish 65 cm sky dish | Hi Tivů Some good pontificating has taken place here, and it just goes to show that you can't get what isn't there in the first place. just like the old saying " you cant get water if the well is dry" thanks for sharing your findings. ![]() Teach | ||
| | |
| | #3 | ||
| Toute Ronde Bon Oeuf Real name: Gordon Join Date: 29-05-2009 Location: North Yorks Moors
Posts: 1801
Thanks: 42
Thanked 166 Times in 160 Posts
My System: Triax 1.1m and Orbital 80cm Motorised Dishes. Various fixed Dishes. Eclectic selection of Digital and Analogue Receivers. Complex switching and distribution that SWMBO cannot fathom. Nor me. | You're welcome. There's nothing like a good spot of pontification! But the exercise was for reference next time it is suggested that such a device might alleviate fringe reception problems (as I suspect you correctly surmised) | ||
| |||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Super Moderator Real name: Paul Join Date: 07-05-2007 Location: South Midlands, UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Posts: 4382
Thanks: 24
Thanked 542 Times in 478 Posts
My System: Zone1, DSI8215 SkyHD, Thomson DSI4214, TF5000CI, Dreambox DM800 HD PVR - Nab BH0.12, TM-5200D, Gibertini 104cm, SNH-031, 36v Actuator, Vbox-II, 42°E to 30°W, Sling Media, Televes H45 Digital Processing Analyser, Satlook Micro+G2 NIT, Rover SDM 1s | | ||
| | |||
| | |
| | #5 | ||
| Super Moderator Real name: Mark Join Date: 17-05-2007 Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4493
Thanks: 76
Thanked 632 Times in 600 Posts
My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT | Very useful test. ![]() Though, annomaly 1, not really one by itself, as, as you say, the amp adds noise to the system and will thus reduce the resultant SNR causing probs where it was barely sufficient in the first place. Good to know that motor signal etc pass through OK. | ||
| | |||
| | |
| | #6 | ||
| Specialist Contributor Join Date: 09-09-2008 Location: Republic of Georgia
Posts: 913
Thanks: 14
Thanked 258 Times in 199 Posts
My System: Covering 30W-105.5E range, two motors, C and Ku band. Various receivers/cards/cams/etc. | As I have tested before (and reported on this forum), On average receiver, average in-line amplifier gives about 10% increase in Q. SL65 is really very bad receiver, I also have it and it's sensitivity is one of worst ones I ever seen. Also, it's very critical to LNB. | ||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| amplifier, evaluation, line |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |