Evaluation Of In Line Amplifier

Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2009   #1
Toute Ronde Bon Oeuf
 
Tivů's Avatar
 
Real name: Gordon
Join Date: 29-05-2009
Location: North Yorks Moors
Posts: 1801
Thanks: 42
Thanked 166 Times in 160 Posts

My System: Triax 1.1m and Orbital 80cm Motorised Dishes. Various fixed Dishes. Eclectic selection of Digital and Analogue Receivers. Complex switching and distribution that SWMBO cannot fathom. Nor me.
Evaluation Of In Line Amplifier

Being one of those who always advocates the theoretical line whenever Satellite IF Amplifiers come up on forum, yet also being aware that the practical experiences of some don't, on the face of it, match the Theory, I forked out 3 Yorkshire Groats for a Chinese made 13-18dB Amplifier from Ebay to play with.

Recap: The Theory is that despite low noise components being the norm nowadays, the Amplifiers will add a modicum of Noise of their own, so can only really be used to compensate for losses on long cable runs. They can only attempt to recover a little of what was already there and was lost.

What they cannot do is compensate for the absence of signal at source. Only a bigger Dish can achieve that. (We are still talking Theoretically here - I have read the reports from others both here and elsewhere which seem to gainsay the theory .........)

The Tests: Fitted this at various places along the cabling to my 1.1m Motorised Dish. ie At the LNB, At the Motor, At the Receiver.

The Constraints: My cable run is not "long", being less than 10m.

The Results: Sadly, the theory is fully borne out. The device passes power and Motor Control signals as promised. The Signal Strength on weaker but stable TPs went up eg from 60 to 70, from 70 to 80 etc. Quality was scarcely affected.

A Couple Of Anomalies:

1. Where a TP was marginal on Quality, the Amplifier effectively blocked it (Not a dicky-bird)! This occurred consistently and I eliminated "finger trouble" on my part.

2. Transferring the Amplifier to my 80cm Motorised Dish threw up similar trends except the Signal Strength went down by 10 points or so!

After some head-scratching, I swopped my Receivers around and discovered that my Kaon behaved as you'd expect and showed the desired increase in indicated Strength. But the Silvercrest SL65 seemed to register a decrease which I put down to over eager AGC.

That conclusion, whilst possibly wrong, is reinforced by the fact that the massively strong TPs from various Satellites especially Astra 2 and Atlantic Bird 3 indicate relatively low Strengths on the Silvercrest, though moderate TPs seem ok. The Kaon again behaves as you'd expect if attached to the same Dish etc.

So I've proved very little but had a decent few hours fa**ying about!

Anybody need a cheap Amplifier?

Tivů is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tivů For This Useful Post:
Robbo (11-10-2009)
Old 11-10-2009   #2
Member
 
Real name: Kelvin
Join Date: 04-01-2009
Location: southcoast uk
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: tecnomate 5600 CI USB super / 5500 ci super/ 1500ci super dragon trex cam, several dead cards sky subscription and box 1.2 metre motorised dish 65 cm sky dish
Talking something for nothing !!

Hi Tivů
Some good pontificating has taken place here, and it just goes to show that you can't get what isn't there in the first place. just like the old saying " you cant get water if the well is dry"
thanks for sharing your findings.

Teach
teach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009   #3
Toute Ronde Bon Oeuf
 
Tivů's Avatar
 
Real name: Gordon
Join Date: 29-05-2009
Location: North Yorks Moors
Posts: 1801
Thanks: 42
Thanked 166 Times in 160 Posts

My System: Triax 1.1m and Orbital 80cm Motorised Dishes. Various fixed Dishes. Eclectic selection of Digital and Analogue Receivers. Complex switching and distribution that SWMBO cannot fathom. Nor me.

You're welcome.

There's nothing like a good spot of pontification!

But the exercise was for reference next time it is suggested that such a device might alleviate fringe reception problems (as I suspect you correctly surmised)

Tivů is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009   #4
Super Moderator
 
satelliteman's Avatar
 
Real name: Paul
Join Date: 07-05-2007
Location: South Midlands, UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Posts: 4382
Thanks: 24
Thanked 542 Times in 478 Posts

My System: Zone1, DSI8215 SkyHD, Thomson DSI4214, TF5000CI, Dreambox DM800 HD PVR - Nab BH0.12, TM-5200D, Gibertini 104cm, SNH-031, 36v Actuator, Vbox-II, 42°E to 30°W, Sling Media, Televes H45 Digital Processing Analyser, Satlook Micro+G2 NIT, Rover SDM 1s

The Slope Compensator Amps are fairly good. Adjustable gain line amplifier with a slope control.

Evaluation Of In Line Amplifier-370650-jpg

satelliteman.
.....
A Detailed DiSEqC Motor Installation Set Up Guide > HERE
Quick Reference Guide also > HERE

Satellites UK site Advertisers
.
An Installers Choice
......

Follow us on
.
satelliteman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009   #5
Super Moderator
 
Robbo's Avatar
 
Real name: Mark
Join Date: 17-05-2007
Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4493
Thanks: 76
Thanked 632 Times in 600 Posts

My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT

Very useful test.

Though, annomaly 1, not really one by itself, as, as you say, the amp adds noise to the system and will thus reduce the resultant SNR causing probs where it was barely sufficient in the first place.

Good to know that motor signal etc pass through OK.

Robbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009   #6
Specialist Contributor
 
BombedOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-09-2008
Location: Republic of Georgia
Posts: 913
Thanks: 14
Thanked 258 Times in 199 Posts

My System: Covering 30W-105.5E range, two motors, C and Ku band. Various receivers/cards/cams/etc.

As I have tested before (and reported on this forum), On average receiver, average in-line amplifier gives about 10% increase in Q.

SL65 is really very bad receiver, I also have it and it's sensitivity is one of worst ones I ever seen. Also, it's very critical to LNB.
BombedOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
amplifier, evaluation, line


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 AM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1