DiseqC versus 36v

Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-07-2004   #1
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9286
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Nothing wrong at all with linear actuators (bordering on the irrational - purlease), as long as its not one of the micro versions (Superjack or anything with Mk3 on it) . These tend to wear quicker than they should due to steel components and underrated nylon cogs in the worm drive.

When setting up the outside kit, make sure you do not drive the dish more than the motor can handle, nor the arm more than the polarmount can handle.

If you need help then come back

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004   #2
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29868
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1098 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

Ah, didn't say that there is anything wrong with linear actuators, but that almost complete rejection of the DiseqC motor is not rational, as the build quality and performance is improving year on year. Yes they are not as sturdy as their 36v counterparts and probably not as fast in most cases, but they fill a useful slot in the marketplace and are very user friendly from an installation and operational standpoint, just don't put anything bigger than 90cm on them.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004   #3
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9286
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Originally Posted by rolfw
Ah, didn't say that there is anything wrong with linear actuators, but that almost complete rejection of the DiseqC motor is not rational, as the build quality and performance is improving year on year. Yes they are not as sturdy as their 36v counterparts and probably not as fast in most cases, but they fill a useful slot in the marketplace and are very user friendly from an installation and operational standpoint, just don't put anything bigger than 90cm on them.

If the receiver purchased has the ability to power a 36V motor then i would do that every time

If Photoman decides after a couple of days that the 88cm isnt big enough, then its less hassle to upgrade with all the hard work behind the dish already in place

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004   #4
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29868
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1098 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

Don't disagree with that at all, but not all of the "best" receivers now have the ability to power a 36 volt motor and if 88cm is the practical limit from a planning or any other consideration, then a DiseqC motor would ft the bill. Add to that the fact that you are experienced at installing motorised dishes and the vast majority of our members aren't.

Not saying there is anything wrong with linear actuators or 36v motors (never did), just saying that to dismiss the DiseqC unit is short sighted and the growing popularity of the same must be more than part driven by suitability for the job and particularly their ease of installation.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004   #5
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9286
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Originally Posted by rolfw
Add to that the fact that you are experienced at installing motorised dishes and the vast majority of our members aren't.

DiSEqC 1.2 is classed as a motorised protocol, it just needs a bit of refining.

Besides Ive found on a number of branded receviers that the DiSEqC system somewhat difficult to set up when compared to the 36 volt options, especially when directing an end user over the phone when the dish has 'moved'.

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2004   #6
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29868
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1098 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

Split this thread to save hijacking the other.

Like you, given the choice for myself, I would install the 36v motor (a few I would avoid), but for small dish installations and ease of installation, I still reckon that the DiseqC wins hands down. Yes, some of the menu structures on the receivers are not what you might call intuitive, but for a newbie who is prepared to read the manual, they are generally easier.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004   #7
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9286
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Worst one Ive seen for instructions was probably the Hyundau 1000, that probably put me off the rest.

What DiSEqC motor system comes top of your list ?

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004   #8
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29868
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1098 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

I think that for ease of installation, the Moteck SG-2100, apparently designed by an ex Jaeger designer, so has similar features, but with the addition of USALS.

You can set hardware limits on it, you have East, west, set to zero and reset controls actually on the motor as well, so less trips up and down the ladder.

Weak points are obviously size limit on dish, but also the design means that with certain dish mounts, the end of the U bolts can foul the LNB "F" connectors on the motor body, had to hacksaw off the ends on one installation to stop it from fouling.

PS. Agree about the Hyundai, the menu system on the HSS800 is pretty naff as well. The Coship is one of the better ones.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
36v, diseqc, versus


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diseqc motor or 36v actuator motor? ALIEN1X DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 1 10-02-2006 11:49 PM
Best DiSEqC Motor ? seret DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 38 06-09-2005 12:38 PM
Help needed with My Theatre & DiSEqC switch please davie DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 9 19-03-2004 07:34 PM
Antenna Feed switches: 12V & Diseqc jeallen01 DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 3 16-02-2004 11:56 AM
diseqc motor & Echostar problems - HELP! css_jay99 DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 0 25-06-2003 02:35 AM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1