Technomate TM-1000 D - Good choice or bad choice??

Information exchange on digital satellite systems other than Sky


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-06-2005   #1
Dreaming Satellites
 
Join Date: 12-06-2005
Location: Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland
Posts: 154
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: Dreambox 8000 HD, 80cm Orbital Satellite Dish Motorized LNB with 2 outputs, 2nd output leading to upstairs and using Dreambox 500S. Pioneer VSX-1018AH-K Amp/Receiver,
Technomate TM-1000 D - Good choice or bad choice??

I am wanting to know whether I have made a good choice or not on choosing the Technomate TM-1000 D Satellite Receiver (patched)?? (I want honest opinions)

If not, is they any way I can get the very best out of it.. (e.g. adding stuff to it - CAMS, slots etc...??)

Last edited by marcaaron20; 15-06-2005 at 04:20 AM. Reason: adding txt
marcaaron20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005   #2
Happy-Buddah
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

As far as a fta receiver is concerned it is just as good as any of the other Technomate fta receivers that I have had, good value for money, but the blind scan facility is useless, too slow.
H-B
  Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005   #3
Rob
Super Nutty Mod
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-10-2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 1399
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

My System: Technomate TMS-1500 CI+ "patched" receiver, 90cm p/f 36v motorised dish, Inverto C120 0.3db LNB, Moteck V-Box 2, Packard Bell 6052 XP Home computer, Toshiba A60 laptop, and lots of Russian Vodka !

As HB says the blind search is crap (no good for feed hunting) but apart from that it's an excellent FTA receiver. Very user friendly and without a doubt the best receiver I've used.
If you want cams, slots, etc, I would recommend the Technomate TM-1500ci+ which for about £30 extra gives you a smart card reader, a common interface, and that is one bloody bargin.

All of the 1000 range (1000,1500, & 1600) can be patched, well worth it.

PS: New software should soon be available to fix the slow blind search problem.

Last edited by Rob; 15-06-2005 at 11:21 AM.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005   #4
Dreamer
 
lovelyperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-2004
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Chief Commander of the Tux
Smile

Originally Posted by Rob
As HB says the blind search is crap (no good for feed hunting) but apart from that it's an excellent FTA receiver. Very user friendly and without a doubt the best receiver I've used.

PS: New software should soon be available to fix the slow blind search problem.
Was just about to order one of the Blind Search range. Had a 5000D for years, good receiver with a very sensitive tuner.

From what has been said above the 'blind' part don't sound too good. Having a Dreambox etc, I was going to buy a TM only for the feedhunting part and imagined the blind scan would be a great 'add' for me.

When you say 'crap' and 'slow', does it do the job in the end. For instance, roughly how long does it take to scan W2 @ 16e.

You replies would be a great help to me.

Thanks lovelyperson
lovelyperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005   #5
Site administrator
 
Analoguesat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 26-07-2003
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 19792
Thanks: 17
Thanked 1165 Times in 959 Posts
Blog Entries: 1

My System: Sky UK. FTA analogue & digital satellite from 6 fixed dishes (5E/7E/9E/10E/13E/16E/ 19E/23E/28E) Pace MSS100, Echostar IP3000VA, Technomate TM-1000D, Dreambox 7020S


The last noble sat warrior to fly the olden flag of Analogue

Thers no CI slots on it so dont think about adding cams to it.( Theres a blanking plate with nothing behind it.)
Analoguesat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2005   #6
Rob
Super Nutty Mod
 
Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-10-2003
Location: Essex
Posts: 1399
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

My System: Technomate TMS-1500 CI+ "patched" receiver, 90cm p/f 36v motorised dish, Inverto C120 0.3db LNB, Moteck V-Box 2, Packard Bell 6052 XP Home computer, Toshiba A60 laptop, and lots of Russian Vodka !

Originally Posted by lovelyperson
Was just about to order one of the Blind Search range. Had a 5000D for years, good receiver with a very sensitive tuner.

From what has been said above the 'blind' part don't sound too good. Having a Dreambox etc, I was going to buy a TM only for the feedhunting part and imagined the blind scan would be a great 'add' for me.
Have a look in "Receiver Reviews" the_wizzz gives an excellent review of the 1000 range of Technomate receivers.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2005   #7
Dreamer
 
lovelyperson's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-2004
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Chief Commander of the Tux
Smile

Originally Posted by Rob
Have a look in "Receiver Reviews" the_wizzz gives an excellent review of the 1000 range of Technomate receivers.
Thanks, as you say 'excellent'. Guess I will buy, got plenty of time to fiddle.

Be safe.

lovelyperson
lovelyperson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bad, choice, good, technomate, tm1000


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad reception on Channel U (Sky 467) solara Sky Digital (BskyB UK) Platform Astra 28.2E: Astra 2D Fringe reception & Tech 5 05-01-2004 01:29 PM
You think the guys in Scotland are bad. Razor The Meeting Place 2 13-12-2003 02:05 PM
Going for a pint could be good for the mind net1 The Meeting Place 3 06-11-2003 07:56 PM
Icecrypt and TechnoMate wilson3010 Cams and decoders General 0 24-09-2003 06:43 AM
technomate tm5000 dapci steve74 Digital systems 3 26-08-2003 11:32 AM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 PM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1