Difference between Quad LNB and Quatro LNB

Information exchange on LNBs, Single satellite, motorised and multi-satellite systems. DiSEqC switches, positioners, motors, actuators, dish-alignment etc.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26-04-2008   #1
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts
Difference between Quad LNB and Quatro LNB

What is the advantage for using a Quatro LNB Plus 4x4 multiswitch or Quad LNB, if you have only four digital receivers?
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #2
Regular Member
 
timbo86's Avatar
 
Join Date: 18-11-2004
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

My System: Dreambox 7020, CM 1.2 with invacom quad c120 & channelmaster feedhorn.
Cost!

You could add as many stb as like like with the right head end set up. But Quattro set ups are costly, were as a quad lnb sould cost around thirty quid.

Or you could use an octto lnb for around fiffty quid.
timbo86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #3
Super Moderator
 
satelliteman's Avatar
 
Real name: Paul
Join Date: 07-05-2007
Location: South Midlands, UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Posts: 4414
Thanks: 24
Thanked 545 Times in 481 Posts

My System: Zone1, DSI8215 SkyHD, Thomson DSI4214, TF5000CI, Dreambox DM800 HD PVR - Nab BH0.12, TM-5200D, Gibertini 104cm, SNH-031, 36v Actuator, Vbox-II, 42°E to 30°W, Sling Media, Televes H45 Digital Processing Analyser, Satlook Micro+G2 NIT, Rover SDM 1s

In short, less cabling

satelliteman.
.....
A Detailed DiSEqC Motor Installation Set Up Guide > HERE
Quick Reference Guide also > HERE

Satellites UK site Advertisers
.
An Installers Choice
......

Follow us on
.
satelliteman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #4
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Thanks timbo86 and satelliteman.
But I still don't get it.
I was told that quatro LNB + 4x4 switch is a better system than quad LNB.
Surely the cabling is easier with the quad LNB.
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #5
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29875
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1099 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

I would like to hear the justification of that, as I can't see any reason why it would be so.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #6
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Originally Posted by rolfw View Post
I would like to hear the justification of that, as I can't see any reason why it would be so.
Thanks rolfw.
This is exactly what I am looking for.
Perhaps with the quatro LNB it gives better future distribution flexibility, if # of receivers exceeds 4 , using another multiswitch than 4x4 ?
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-04-2008   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 30-06-2007
Location: Brussels Belgium
Posts: 253
Thanks: 28
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

My System: DB7000S HDD USB2GB; 2CM120+Norsat4106Afor HH&7707AforVH on 7°W; Triax 2X110, 1X88 and 1X64. LNBFs: 2BESTQ, 2InvacomQ; 3XAlps, 2Inverto(1Q), 3XBEST; Switches and M/S; Centauri P-168. 30w, 8w, 5w , 1w, 5e, 9e, 16e, 23e, 28e; 13E, 19E; 26E

A quattro allows you to use individual line amplifiers that are powered by the multiswitch instead of by the receiver.
Those installations that need a line amplifier are better served by a quattro.
Besides, as the switching of the quad switches the local oscillator to the correct polarity it also varies the supply voltage to the LNB port.
With the quattro the voltage on the LNB port is not varied and the polarity/22khz emitted by the receiver serve only as a signal to the multiswitch with no current.
Everytime the receiver is turned off the Quad goes dead and is reactivated when turning the receiver on again.
The multiswitch being on continuously does not subject the LNB to these changes of state.
This implies longer life for the LNB and the receiver.

Last edited by canofan; 26-04-2008 at 11:58 AM.
canofan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to canofan For This Useful Post:
HB13DISH (28-04-2008)
Old 26-04-2008   #8
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29875
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1099 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

Well that's certainly the case, just swap out the switch for one with more outlets, but a quad LNB suffices for the average household needs.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #9
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Originally Posted by canofan View Post
A quattro allows you to use individual line amplifiers that are powered by the multiswitch instead of by the receiver.
Those installations that need a line amplifier are better served by a quattro.
Besides, as the switching of the quad switches the local oscillator to the correct polarity it also varies the supply voltage to the LNB port.
With the quattro the voltage on the LNB port is not varied and the polarity/22khz emitted by the receiver serve only as a signal to the multiswitch with no current.
Everytime the receiver is turned off the Quad goes dead and is reactivated when turning the receiver on again.
The multiswitch being on continuously does not subject the LNB to these changes of state.
This implies longer life for the LNB and the receiver.
Thanks canofan for the post.
I am beginning to see the light, especially the bit about the long life as a result of having the same voltage and polarization for the four sections of the quatro LNB, and without subjecting the LNB to constant changes as a result of frequent zapping.
I also like the bit about the possibility of expanding to more than four receivers using a 4x8 multiswitch (if there is one ?), as the LNB would be situated in a difficult to access location and replacing it can cost a lot of money for the professional installer.
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 30-06-2007
Location: Brussels Belgium
Posts: 253
Thanks: 28
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

My System: DB7000S HDD USB2GB; 2CM120+Norsat4106Afor HH&7707AforVH on 7°W; Triax 2X110, 1X88 and 1X64. LNBFs: 2BESTQ, 2InvacomQ; 3XAlps, 2Inverto(1Q), 3XBEST; Switches and M/S; Centauri P-168. 30w, 8w, 5w , 1w, 5e, 9e, 16e, 23e, 28e; 13E, 19E; 26E

Originally Posted by HB13DISH View Post
Thanks canofan for the post.
I am beginning to see the light, especially the bit about the long life as a result of having the same voltage and polarization for the four sections of the quatro LNB, and without subjecting the LNB to constant changes as a result of frequent zapping.
I also like the bit about the possibility of expanding to more than four receivers using a 4x8 multiswitch (if there is one ?), as the LNB would be situated in a difficult to access location and replacing it can cost a lot of money for the professional installer.
You are welcome, you have helped me in the past as well.
There are reasonably priced multiswitches for 4,6,8,12 and 16 receivers, mostly on german online sites.
canofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #11
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29875
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1099 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

Hm, I can see where the stabilized voltage may perhaps theoretically extend the life on an LNB and come in useful if line amps are required, but not entirely sure by how much though and whether such a saving would be value for money.

The difference in price between a quad LNB against a quattro LNB and a multiswitch (if only going for four outlets) would be considerable, probably to the degree that it would need to at least double the life of the LNB, purely to break even on the deal.

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #12
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Originally Posted by rolfw View Post
Hm, I can see where the stabilized voltage may perhaps extend the life on an LNB and come in useful if line amps are required, but not entirely sure by how much though and whether such a saving would be value for money.

The difference in price between a quad LNB against a quattro LNB and a multiswitch (if only going for four outlets) would be considerable, probably to the degree that it would need to at least double the life of the LNB, purely to break even on the deal.
In my case, I am willing to pay a lot more for a longer life LNB, just to avoid the replacement cost.
I am sure that anybody with an easy access to the LNB and a DIY replacement would find a quad LNB is a cheaper choice.
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 30-06-2007
Location: Brussels Belgium
Posts: 253
Thanks: 28
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

My System: DB7000S HDD USB2GB; 2CM120+Norsat4106Afor HH&7707AforVH on 7°W; Triax 2X110, 1X88 and 1X64. LNBFs: 2BESTQ, 2InvacomQ; 3XAlps, 2Inverto(1Q), 3XBEST; Switches and M/S; Centauri P-168. 30w, 8w, 5w , 1w, 5e, 9e, 16e, 23e, 28e; 13E, 19E; 26E

_http://satserver.de/catalog/default.php?cPath=32_35
using this one supplier as a reference in the effort towards other things being equal:
INVACOM QUAD C 120 LNB QDF-031 0.3dB = Euros 73.95
INVACOM QUATTRO C 120 LNB QTF-031 0.3dB = 50.95
SATMATRIX MULTISWITCH MS 5/4 S 4 RECEIVER= 48.95
The satmatrix is an excellent multiswitch

The quattro/multiswitch
option costs Euros 99.90
The quad solution 73.95
difference Euros = 25.95

You probably would agree that the difference is acceptable.
canofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-04-2008   #14
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Originally Posted by canofan View Post
_http://satserver.de/catalog/default.php?cPath=32_35
using this one supplier as a reference in the effort towards other things being equal:
INVACOM QUAD C 120 LNB QDF-031 0.3dB = Euros 73.95
INVACOM QUATTRO C 120 LNB QTF-031 0.3dB = 50.95
SATMATRIX MULTISWITCH MS 5/4 S 4 RECEIVER= 48.95
The satmatrix is an excellent multiswitch

The quattro/multiswitch
option costs Euros 99.90
The quad solution 73.95
difference Euros = 25.95

You probably would agree that the difference is acceptable.
Thanks. I agree wholeheartedly.
Another point worth taking into account is that as the multiswitch is usually used indoors and is not subjected to the extreme climate conditions (cold, hot, rain, sun, etc.) then it's life span is probably much longer than either LNB.
Therefore if the quatro LNB goes, the replacement cost is only 50.95 Euro (for the lucky ones who can replace it themselves).
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
difference, lnb, quad, quatro


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1