Morning Topper... you've been busy... just let me get some coffee and I'll reply...
the link didn't work it just stayed waiting.. I'll try it again...
..... SS 'has' a higher coefficient of expansion and lower heat conductivity than carbon steel ... either that or a whole engineering industry have cocked it up... seen it in practice far too many times and spent too much time dealing with anti-expansion techniques for SS ...... if SS has the 'same' ...0%
difference, at low temperatures ... is what I meant by 0%
If ss bolts on the back of an LNB arm expand or contract x% more than the carbon steel they're bolting together... and you amplify that slight tightening or loosening effect down the length of the lnb arm to the lnb .. and then to the dish face ... .001mm turns into what over 1.5m ?? (depends where the pivot point is and if the LNB arm is braced too) and then up to the satellite..... If SS bolts are used on the carbon steel dish/ polar mount too ... and the day heats up or freezes ... and you drop x% signal off a weak sat and lose it.. I think it's
just common sense to keep that out of the equation with everything else that effects the signal.
2mm can be a mile on an LNB's FL/ skew and angle of aim to the dish on a really difficult sat. Where the real sweat spot is on any LNB is one of life's mysteries... they're all different... I could get rude here and compare it with a certain part of the female anatomy and how they are all different...

but I wont do that.
EDIT... _http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/linear-expansion-coefficients-d_95.html without spending hours (which I haven't got) one quick Google and this link shows 316 SS v Steel's coefficiant of expansion.. the other part is heat conductivity... multiply the effect and you have a... er.. bi-metal strip thing going on..