LNB strength

Information exchange on LNBs, Single satellite, motorised and multi-satellite systems. DiSEqC switches, positioners, motors, actuators, dish-alignment etc.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2008   #1
Member
 
Join Date: 20-10-2006
Location: Fylde Coast in West Lancashire
Posts: 54
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: WinXP/Firefox 85cm Transparent dish and 3 dual LNB's 13,19,28 One diseqc to Sky Star 2, and a diseqc to TM1500. Plus a loop from the TM1500 to a Pace MSS100 analog sat receiver.
LNB strength

When using a dual output lnb does the inner or outer have a stronger signal than the other.

My setup is complicated, 85cm dish with 3 dual output lnb's. The 3 outers go to a diseqc and the 3 inners to another diseqc. One cable goes thru the wall to SkyStar2, the PC and DVB Dream (with Prog DVB as an alternative if needed). The other cable goes round the house to the backroom downstairs, to a TM 1500 and the TV.
I can't see if its the inner or outer which goes thru the wall to the PC but
the TM 1500 with the long cable run shows strength at around 75, the DVB Dream (and Prog DVB) on the short cable run shows Quality around 48 to 50 and Level around 44 to 48. Normally its upstairs live or downstairs live, but today I've run a check with them both live and got the same results.

All this is because on the Pc I constantly get 'Timeout - This PID is empty. Rescan' and doing several rescans a day is sending me bonkers.
I would have expected the lower strength to be on the longer cable run.
dardruba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: 08-02-2005
Location: Lot, Dordogne, Correze border.
Posts: 246
Thanks: 3
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts

My System: FTE Max, Skystar2.3 and Skystar2.6, 2.2m Kinhuge Dish with Inverto LNB and Invacom ADF-120 feedhorn. Pace 1.3.25 and 80cm for Sky.

The quality (and signal levels) are not comparative between the two receivers. You might find that the TM is more sensitive (to weak signals). You might also find that one diseqc switch is lossier than the other, and one LNB OP might be slightly higher. I would take the TM upstairs to see how it performs, this will identify whether it's the Rx that is more sensitive or if you are losing signal to your Skystar.
Low Profile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008   #3
Super Moderator
 
Robbo's Avatar
 
Real name: Mark
Join Date: 17-05-2007
Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4487
Thanks: 76
Thanked 632 Times in 600 Posts

My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT

Originally Posted by dardruba View Post
I would have expected the lower strength to be on the longer cable run.
Yes, a longer cable will attenuate the signal more, but all other factors must be the same to make a compative mesaurement.

Robbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008   #4
Member
 
Join Date: 20-10-2006
Location: Fylde Coast in West Lancashire
Posts: 54
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: WinXP/Firefox 85cm Transparent dish and 3 dual LNB's 13,19,28 One diseqc to Sky Star 2, and a diseqc to TM1500. Plus a loop from the TM1500 to a Pace MSS100 analog sat receiver.

=. I would take the TM upstairs to see how it performs, this will identify whether it's the Rx that is more sensitive or if you are losing signal to your Skystar.
Great suggestion, Thank You. Funny how you dont think clearly when you are stressed.
I ran the TM1500 on the upstairs incoming cable. I got a good signal on 19E of 75 (same as downstairs) but zilch on 13E or 28E. It doesnt show an error message.
When I put it back into SkyStar2 I got the same error message in vPlug on all 3 Timeout- This PID is empty. Rescan

Perhaps I've disturbed the diseqc box. I bought the 3 lnb setup and asked the installer to install my existing LNB but I was greedy. It was too heavy for the arm which swung around in the wind.
I uncoupled the 4th LNB and sliced off the cables before they went into the diseqc. This summer I've removed the cable stubs and the Fconnectors but I didnt have the proper tape so I left the plug bare and just put the weatherproof cover back on and ziptied it.
The other 3 in and the single out are still properly sealed.
Did I do the right thing, and could this be the reason for the constant need to rescan ?

Last edited by Robbo; 02-12-2008 at 11:02 PM. Reason: put in missing ]
dardruba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008   #5
Super Moderator
 
Robbo's Avatar
 
Real name: Mark
Join Date: 17-05-2007
Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4487
Thanks: 76
Thanked 632 Times in 600 Posts

My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT

The only way to find out is to gradually work your way back through the system, until you get to the LNBs, testing the signal along the way.

You can test the other LNB outputs by swapping the outputs, and see if the upstairs still works Ok, and that the downstairs doesn't any more.

Robbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2008   #6
Member
 
Join Date: 20-10-2006
Location: Fylde Coast in West Lancashire
Posts: 54
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: WinXP/Firefox 85cm Transparent dish and 3 dual LNB's 13,19,28 One diseqc to Sky Star 2, and a diseqc to TM1500. Plus a loop from the TM1500 to a Pace MSS100 analog sat receiver.

Oh Yes! Thanks Robbo
I'll save that task for a warmer day.
dardruba is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
lnb, strength


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 AM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1