High frequency signal loss on ThorInformation exchange on LNBs, Single satellite, motorised and multi-satellite systems. DiSEqC switches, positioners, motors, actuators, dish-alignment etc. | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| |||||||
High frequency signal loss on ThorInformation exchange on LNBs, Single satellite, motorised and multi-satellite systems. DiSEqC switches, positioners, motors, actuators, dish-alignment etc. | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB |
I recently installed an Invacom 0.3dB LNB on a 1.1 Triax dish. On Thor 1W, I receive strong signals at lower frequencies, but by 12643H I am not recieving very much at all. At higher frequencies than this, I get nothing at all. Is this down to the transponders or could it be how I fitted my LNB? | ||
| | |
| | #2 | ||
| Super Moderator Real name: Paul Join Date: 07-05-2007 Location: South Midlands, UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Posts: 4412
Thanks: 24
Thanked 545 Times in 481 Posts
My System: Zone1, DSI8215 SkyHD, Thomson DSI4214, TF5000CI, Dreambox DM800 HD PVR - Nab BH0.12, TM-5200D, Gibertini 104cm, SNH-031, 36v Actuator, Vbox-II, 42°E to 30°W, Sling Media, Televes H45 Digital Processing Analyser, Satlook Micro+G2 NIT, Rover SDM 1s | More attenuation higher up the band you go yes, but this will be LNb, dish alignment or LNb skew causing you problems. From your location the LNb skew should be almost vertical. Also check the LNb focal point. | ||
| | |||
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to satelliteman For This Useful Post: | sandersc (24-01-2009) |
| | #3 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB | I checked my LNB and dish. It is near enough perfect, so I am suspecting my LNB is faulty or perhaps the Invacom doesn't go up to 12723H ? | ||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB | Just checked LNB frequency, should go up to 12750. Perhaps receiver is the problem, it quotes frequency range950 - 2150MHz, could this be the problem? | ||
| | |
| | #5 | |||
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| 12750 (LNB spec.) - 10600 = 2150 MHz, so they are "matched". So that is within spec. for the Receiver (just) - but what does the spec. actually mean ......... ? | |||
|
| | #7 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB | I have no problem with high frequencies on Astra at 19E so it must be my set-up. I have about 55m of cable so perhaps this could also be a factor? | ||
| | |
| | #8 | ||
| Super Moderator Real name: Mark Join Date: 17-05-2007 Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4497
Thanks: 76
Thanked 636 Times in 603 Posts
My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT | Could be, the attenuation of the cable at the higher frequencies is greater. What cable are yoou using? Maybe you'd do better with 125 rather than 100 type. | ||
| | |||
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Robbo For This Useful Post: | divibi (24-01-2009) |
| | #9 | ||
| Design Engineer/Installer Join Date: 08-08-2007 Location: Central UK, E Cheshire ..near Jodrell
Posts: 987
Thanks: 74
Thanked 156 Times in 143 Posts
My System: 75e-75w C & KU, 36v h-h /36v & diseqc actuators / diseqc -USALS motors / Anlg to HD Channel Masters C120s dishes, stb's inc echo3000, lnbs, meters, custom polar mounts & elevation/incline actuator conversions... | The Invacom isn't the best match for the Triax 1.1.. (although that won't account for the unusual Hi freq' cut off) where is the LNB located as regards its position in the LNB holder... middle / back/ forward etc.. for best signal | ||
| | |
| The Following User Says Thank You to pedro2000uk For This Useful Post: | divibi (24-01-2009) |
| | #10 | ||
| Super Moderator Real name: Paul Join Date: 07-05-2007 Location: South Midlands, UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Posts: 4412
Thanks: 24
Thanked 545 Times in 481 Posts
My System: Zone1, DSI8215 SkyHD, Thomson DSI4214, TF5000CI, Dreambox DM800 HD PVR - Nab BH0.12, TM-5200D, Gibertini 104cm, SNH-031, 36v Actuator, Vbox-II, 42°E to 30°W, Sling Media, Televes H45 Digital Processing Analyser, Satlook Micro+G2 NIT, Rover SDM 1s | Do you also have another LNb to try first to eliminate the Invacom itself ? | ||
| | |||
| | |
| | #11 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB | I tried the LNB in all positions with all skews. Bent the lnb arm to check angle etc etc. The LNB/Dish is set up perfectly. I heard all this stuff about skew, but on 1W you can twist it all over the place and the signal stays the same. I have just replaced a faulty Titanium 0.2dB. I won't be getting any more of those. I might buy a MTI Blue Line 0.3 dB Universal LNB, but I don't have a spare. Pedro2000uk, what LNB works better with a Triax? I bought quality cable (i'll check the ref though). I am going to try the receiver next to the LNB when the weather improves! If that works, I'll get a signal amplifier. Thanks for all the suggestions. | ||
| | |
| | #12 | ||
| Design Engineer/Installer Join Date: 08-08-2007 Location: Central UK, E Cheshire ..near Jodrell
Posts: 987
Thanks: 74
Thanked 156 Times in 143 Posts
My System: 75e-75w C & KU, 36v h-h /36v & diseqc actuators / diseqc -USALS motors / Anlg to HD Channel Masters C120s dishes, stb's inc echo3000, lnbs, meters, custom polar mounts & elevation/incline actuator conversions... | We often modify the Triax 1.1s to a shorter focal length (the one's without the folding arm anyway) to gain c. 35% .. most LNBs favour c. 15mm- 25mm shorter. You can get a long neck LNBf like some Edisons or MTI Supers to get closer instead of mod'ing but then you are limited to just a few lnbfs. The Smart Titanium are OK - too many people use them and they do well 'usually'- not seen one fail actually. It is probably best to just get any LNB to test for that high freq' problem first and that it is not in the receiver and perhaps consider that a fault (short etc.) hasn't caused it (and had damaged the Titanium). It could also be ground based interference in the direction of 1w. We've found several LNBs beat the Invacoms on a 1.1.. including the Titanium .. the Invacoms (mainly quads) seem to do well on big dishes (1.8s- 2.4s and bigger) on very weak signals like 28e's 2d in Spain & 7w H's here. | ||
| | |
| | #13 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-08-2008 Location: South East
Posts: 6
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: Echostar DSB2210 Receiver 1.1 Triax Dish Nokia SatScan Titanium 0.2DB LNB | Thanks Pedro. Perhaps I should take the LNB out of the arm and move it closer to see if this helps. sliding it within the holder had no effect. I saw your other posts about making the adjustments to the holder and the arm, so if I can see an improvement, I'll give it a go. Any idea where I can get an MTI Super? I can see the MTI Blue Line 0.3 dB Universal LNB, but it doesn't have a long neck. | ||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| frequency, high, loss, signal, thor |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |