official spec's RELASED for BOTH 800 and 8000, screenshots supplied!

Prophessor

It's a shame the dm800 uses an Alps BSBE2 tuner instead of Sharp. For this kind of money I would expect something better.

__________________


When people ask me what I think, I tell them: "I think all of the meat around the pig's ass is pork."

iwol

is there any possibility this may decode 4.2.2 feeds plz

rato

Does that mean it will be less sensitive in weak signal areas?

__________________

Prophessor

Overall dreamboxes aren't known for their sensitive tuners, all of them from ALPS (as far as i know). For fringe reception dreambox it's not best receiver around, so don't expect to pull in as much signal from it like you have with your humax. It would be great if they used a Sharp tuner like other brands do, since they are of better build quality and more sensitive for weak signals.

If you search around you will find this be true and also that their have been a few members with tuner problems. Can't recall the name of that member but the tuner got fried for some reason. It's not a big issue by any means, but on the other hand I never saw any relook users complaining about this issue.

Anyway you can compare the specs of the dm800 with it's rival from relook, cuberevo mini and see wich is supposed to be better.
_http://www.dgstation.co.kr/new/download.php?f=/material/CubeRevo-mini%20spec%20and%20features.pdf
I'm 80% sure I going for a dm800 on the next month or so, but i doesn't hurt to compare whats around.

__________________


When people ask me what I think, I tell them: "I think all of the meat around the pig's ass is pork."