mesh vs solid dishes

For those of you with an appetite for the scientific and technical, whether it be lofty theory or more practical discussion.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2006   #26
Mod and septic resident
 
Channel Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-2000
Location: London SW
Posts: 9274
Thanks: 6
Thanked 204 Times in 190 Posts

Originally Posted by spiney
Ho hum, sorry, I'm probably not explaining too well here (Spiney kills off previously interesting thread

Maybe I need to post some 'nice dish' shots to get interest up again ?

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"
Channel Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2006   #27
Panthera leo massaieus
 
Simba27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 24-08-2004
Location: Uxbridge UK
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

My System: Comag SL55 receiver. Lidl 0.6 LNB. Lidl 80cm dish. Metronic DiSEqC motor. Mico STB235 Freeview box. JVC SVHS Video .Targa 160GB HDD/DVD recorder. 3 x UHF modulators. 6-way Booster/Splitter.

I understand what you are saying about diffraction. The point of the exercise being to modify the dish such that the waves are reflected into the LNB rather then being diffracted. I'm not sure what you mean about an impedance mismatch or how that is relevant.

Having looked at my dish again, I can see why the experiment failed. The surface of the filled-holes is nowhere near as smooth as the surface of the metal. I do believe that some improvement would have been noticed if I had chosen a very fine filler, and then used micromesh to polish it really smooth - the dish having been made equivalent to a solid dish. However it's also true that the man-hours necessary to do this properly would be prohibitive.

As predicted earlier: I am not getting any less signal because I have not modified the existing surface. Unfortunately I am not getting any more signal because the surfaces I have added are not smooth and accurate enough.

Last edited by Simba27; 08-07-2006 at 04:34 PM.
Simba27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2006   #28
Super Moderator
 
Lancelot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-06-2004
Location: Here again
Posts: 3631
Thanks: 8
Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts

My System: SS1. 3.4Ghz P4. 125cm Gibbi with Channelmaster feedhorn and Inverto C120 twin. 36v H to H 62E - 61W


...And thou were the truest friend to thy lover that ever bestrad horse..."

Just a thought here, has anyone got any info on the projected RF reflective properties of 'ready mix easy grout' at 10 - 12GHz? .I suspect it would be absorptive rather than reflective unless you have some RF reflective spray paint to give it a couple of coats with.


L.

Support our Advertisers



I've got an inferiority complex, but it's not a very good one.
Lancelot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006   #29
Member
 
Join Date: 28-03-2004
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

6 years ago at C band, i cover my chicken mesh dish with Aluminum foil tape
& i got improvements in signal, i think the nature of in mesh create a lot diffraction,
you did not find any change may be due to
1-properties of 'ready mix easy grout'
2 satellite signal you are receiving very strong??
fawad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2006   #30
Guest
 
spiney's Avatar
 
Join Date: 29-04-2005
Location: Midlands
Posts: 1514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

My System: Pace 2200 Sky digibox with ftv card, Comag SL65 FTA sat receiver, 40cm Sky minidish, Setpal terrestrial receiver (for free uk tv only!).

What I said was, for wavelengths bigger than holes, the field only exists a short distance behind the holes - unless you deliberately extract energy - hence what you get is reflection, but it's not perfect, a solid dish is slightly better.

You can't "fill in the holes"! What you'd have to do is create a new solid continuous conductive surface with no rf impedence mismatches. There's no practical method of doing this at all, never mind as a DIY job.
spiney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
dishes, mesh, solid


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dish Choice - Mesh or Solid, which is best? Markie9999 DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised systems 4 04-12-2004 07:42 AM
Two dishes over a single cable? Martie Multi-receiver/TV systems - Domestic only 6 18-11-2004 07:24 PM
Mesh or Solid Dishes neil mcclary Sky Digital (BSkyB) and Astra 28.2 East General 8 01-09-2003 08:23 PM
Dishes sailor Sky Digital (BskyB UK) Platform Astra 28.2E: Astra 2D Fringe reception & Tech 6 30-06-2003 01:12 AM
Solid Vs mesh Robbiewright Sky Digital (BskyB UK) Platform Astra 28.2E: Astra 2D Fringe reception & Tech 4 23-02-2003 12:14 PM






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1