Unification Theory | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| | #1 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-01-2004 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| One of the biggest quest at present is the quest for the Unification Theory. For the uninitiated, this is the theory that ties together the General Theory of relativity, and Chaos Theory. The former holds true for large bodies but not at the quantum level, whereas the latter holds true at the quantum level but not at the large bodies level. The latest unification theory being worked actively is String Theory, but I can't help but think that this concept is too complex to be related to nature, which after all is what we are studying!!!! I have a theory that I have not published, or indeed spoken to anyone about, as I do not have any contact with the field of physics, but here goes. I believe that the mass of an object effects the speed that time travels in its location. There it is, out in the open!!!! Let me explain in simple terms. If you were to view the entire history of our galaxy from start to now in a second the viewer would witness something that looked chaotic, whereas if you looked at the destruction of atoms in the study of quarks where the entire process was slowed down to the extent that it took the lifetime to date of our universe to complete, then it would look neutonian. In this case both Theories would be correct dependent on the relationship between your mass and the mass of the object being viewed. The thing that started me thinking along these lines was a Terry Pratchet Discworld novel. In the story mountains were alive but they moved so slowly that humans believed them to be inanimate. From the Mountains perspective, humans were just a brief annoyance, chaotic. Any of you guys want to talk to a madman!!! ![]() | ||
| | |
| | #2 | ||
| Irish Mod Join Date: 30-09-2002 Location: Ireland
Posts: 1301
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 4 Posts
| Where all mad here...Read some of my old posts in this section. There was a theory put forward some years ago that was similar to yours called the “ local time theory “. This was based on the old spinning record trick, a clock was proved to speed up time when placed on the outside of a spinning record, but a clock placed nearer the middle moved slower. By using an atomic clock they where able to detect a slight difference between both clocks. Someone then said ( many years later ) that they thought the time difference was caused, not by the outside clock moving faster than the inside one, but that it weighed more, as the outside was subject to greater centrifugal force, and maybe this was the cause of the time difference.
__________________ Don't mind my spelling | ||
| | |
| | #4 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-01-2004 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Not a chance!!.... There are those that believe space to fold back on itself and therefore form an endless loop, but what is outside that loop? As for thinking in more than 4 dimensions, my tiny brain has yet to come to terms with the idea! | ||
| | |
| | #7 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-01-2004 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Maybe you guys are on to something. Maybe time is in relation to how happy you are. The more you enjoy yourself, the quicker time passes. God is a sick Ba****d!!!!
__________________ Ignotum per ignotius | ||
| | |
| | #8 | ||
| Dazed and Confused Mod Join Date: 28-06-2003 Location: Wirral, NW England
Posts: 2574
Thanks: 1
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
My System: Various digiboxes, broken Nokia 9800S, numerous analogue boxes. My lovely little lappy, HP Omnibook 6100 | Don't forget that the older you get the quicker time passes as well. Stop! I want to get off and catch the one coming along later. PaulR | ||
| | |
| | #10 | ||
| Salty Tech Monster Mod Join Date: 17-11-2003 Location: South East England
Posts: 1376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
| Funny thing age and time passing....the other day the wife was standing looking at herself in the mirror, she say's to me ''Look at me i'm gettin old, fat an ugly!.....pay me some kind of compliment?'' I replied ''Yer eyesights spot on!'' | ||
| | |
| | #12 | |||
| Salty Tech Monster Mod Join Date: 17-11-2003 Location: South East England
Posts: 1376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Last edited by waverider; 14-01-2004 at 05:37 PM. | |||
| | |
| | #13 | |||
| Mod and septic resident Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: London SW
Posts: 7217
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
|
__________________ There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness" | |||
| | |
| | #14 | |||
| Member Join Date: 09-01-2004 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
__________________ Ignotum per ignotius | |||
| | |
| | #15 | ||
| "Satellite Expert" Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: Kernow
Posts: 701
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
My System: Humax IRCI5400z, Sony Digibox, Digilogic Freeview box, 1.1m Triax, Manhattan DiSEqC mount, various cards, Season Interface | The difference in elapsed time between the inner and outer sections of a spinning disc is due to velocity and not to mass. Einstein's theory of Special Relativity showed that time passes more slowly for a moving object. The twins paradox illustrates this. The General Theory of Relativity explained gravity by the curvature of spacetime. The Grand Unification Theory, which Albert spent the last part of his life trying to establish, would explain the relationship between the Stong Nuclear Force, the Weak Nuclear Force, the Electromagneic Force and the Force of Gravity. Physicists now mostly accept that the first three were unified just after the Big Bang and became separate entities only as the Universe cooled; it's the link with gravity which poses the problem. Gravity is a very weak force and noticeable only on a large (ie human and upwards) scale. The Strong and Weak Nuclear forces are much stronger, but operate at a sub-atomic level. Electromagnetic effects are detectable from the subatomic level to the cosmic scale. It's not the Chaos Theory which is incompatible with Relativity, Orphidian, it's Quantum Mechanics. If you want a readable account of how String (more lately M brane Theory) might offer us the Theory of Everything, try Brian Greene's 'The Elegant Universe' - recently serialised on tv (Channel 4, if I remember correctly) as 'The Theory of Everything'. John Gribbin and Stephen Hawking have also written some good popular stuff on this area. You'll find that reading up on black holes will help your understanding of the relationship between gravity, the speed of light and time.
__________________ wolsty | ||
| | |
| | #17 | |||
| Mod and septic resident Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: London SW
Posts: 7217
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
|
Thanks for the warning, Ill put an additional order in at the bar.
__________________ There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness" | |||
| | |
| | #20 | ||
| Mod and septic resident Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: London SW
Posts: 7217
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
| Scientific American has this month got five page article on the bringing together of small and large universe theories, apparently its awaiting some definitive results from a satellite due for launch in three years time, but there is a good chance we all live in a digital universe
__________________ There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness" | ||
| | |
| | #22 | ||
| Mod and septic resident Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: London SW
Posts: 7217
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
| Many people have said Time does not Exist. (usually not around the end of January and Self Assessment time)
__________________ There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness" | ||
| | |
| | #23 | |||
| Salty Tech Monster Mod Join Date: 17-11-2003 Location: South East England
Posts: 1376
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() | |||
| | |
| | #24 | ||
| Member Join Date: 09-01-2004 Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Maybe we should ask Terry Pratchet about the nature of time, given that he is a God. After all, he has created a world, all be it, a flat one!!!
__________________ Ignotum per ignotius | ||
| | |
| | #25 | ||
| The Consumate Dreamer Join Date: 01-01-2000 Location: Somewhere where the Sauer is Kraut and the Wurst is Brat
Posts: 4421
Thanks: 45
Thanked 56 Times in 51 Posts
My System: I bet on red. If I lose, I double the bet on red again. I continue with this until I lost everything. ![]() Muhuhuhahahahahaaaaarrrgggh | Well, Albert E did have some interesting theories, but I am leaning more towards Douglas Adams's school of thought.
__________________ I only believe stuff that comes straight from Mr. Horses mouthHelp build Satellites City! Help build the Satellites MiniCity - no downloads, no money involved, just a daily click onto the site. More details here: http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/717922-post1.html | ||
| | |