Octagon Hd or Clark Tech Hd the better Choice?For all (Non Sky) HD receiving equipment discussion and where to find the transmissions | |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | |
| |||||||
Octagon Hd or Clark Tech Hd the better Choice?For all (Non Sky) HD receiving equipment discussion and where to find the transmissions | |
|
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
29-08-2008
| #1 | ||
| Member  Join Date: 23-10-2007 Location: Austria
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
My System: 4,5 m Andrew -Multifeed C/Ku Band |
Hello Guys, can someone tell me - which Reciever for poor Signals is to prefer? Any Hints? Regards Montafon Guy!  | ||
|  |
|
29-08-2008
| #2 | |||
| Amo Amas Amant Admin  Join Date: 18-11-2004 Location: Blackburn NW England (Siberia)
Posts: 11294
Thanks: 24
Thanked 506 Times in 465 Posts
My System: IDD CI24 ECONO MM Penta 1.20 Galaxy II 1.2Mtr Polar MTG yes it has been on the arc for 21 years and is still driven by a modified wiper motor from a Ford Anglia. It's like me sometimes groans but always performs  Saved us from the black plague of ignoratio elenchi, he awaits a special badge with jugs |
| |||
| War does not determine who is right, it determines who is left! Formerly toppervte33h whose six pack has turned into a keg Help support this web site by making a donation Or use other options to help support Sats UK Show Your Support by clicking the button  Thank you. Freddie Flintoff is back | ||||
|
| |
|
29-08-2008
| #3 | ||
| Specialist Contributor  Join Date: 25-04-2005 Location: Austria
Posts: 1779
Thanks: 4
Thanked 245 Times in 220 Posts
My System: 1,25 Fibostop Jäger Smr 1224 & Smo 36 Dual Axsis Motor Dynasat F1 Monterey 140 Drembox 800 sky Pace HD Box Tagra 2,20 M Fullsize Dish Echostar 2,40m Mesh for cband! | Hello Johan! the ocatagon is much cheaper then the clark tech,i dont have tested yet this modells,but on the ocatagon i can say,that it posible to select the tuner sensitvity by remote controll,i read on the net,what that exactly means i canot tell you at the moment! when you need a sensitive hd tuner,with hd,buy the ferguson Hd! ++/www.terem.de/Ferguson-HF-8800-HDTV/ it is the same then the homecast hd 5101 ci but with build in multicrypt cam! menu handling is not the best of all,but the tuner senstivy is very good! also where you can take a eye is the new edison argus HD! | ||
|
| |
|
29-08-2008
| #4 | ||
| Regular Member  Join Date: 27-06-2008 Location: Germany
Posts: 62
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
My System: Fibo's 60, SF75, 90, 120 (motorized), Triax Unique MF, DVB-S2 cards | I think the Octagon HD is not "much cheaper" than the CT 5000. Both have a sensitive tuner and it really depends on what you want to receive, where & with what equipment. | ||
|
| |
|
30-08-2008
| #5 | ||
| Member Join Date: 23-10-2007 Location: Austria
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
My System: 4,5 m Andrew -Multifeed C/Ku Band | Thank you guys, i found in another Forum the answer i needed! For all: The Octagon is the more sensitive One than the Clark Tech! Regards Montafon Guy! @Turok: who is Johan? | ||
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| choice, clark, octagon, tech |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
