Local Loop Unbundling - questions | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | ![]() |
| | #1 | ||
| Super Moderator Join Date: 22-12-2003 Location: Brighton
Posts: 5122
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 11 Posts
My System: Dreambox 7000, Skystar2 |
"AOL is planning to spend £120m to provide broadband and phone services direct to punters in a move that will further erode BT's dominance of the UK's telecoms sector. The ISP joins a growing number of companies - including Wanadoo, Sky, Bulldog and the Carphone Warehouse - that are committed to local loop unbundling (LLU). An initial £50m investment in LLU will see AOL install its kit in about 300 exchanges during the first half of this year - enabling the ISP to provide services to about 20 per cent of UK households. Source: The Register" Can somebody explain to me how this works? Who determines which company gets to install what hardware in which exchanges, and how will the overall integrity of each exchange be managed and overseen? What stops me from requesting permission to install hardware in my local exchange? OK stupid question, but the real question is... is this really 'unbundling' or is it just a chance for some hefty backhanders and dirty dealings (AKA re-bundling) leaving the telecoms customer shafted once again? Excuse my cynicism, (and though I'm all for undoing the BT monopoly) but if companies are installing their own hardware, is this much better than what went before? Shouldn't it work like the deregulation of the gas and electricity industries where third parties 'leased' capacity, but released from the restrictions that BT currently place on them? I accept that it's not quite the same deal, with advancing technology driving new business opportunities but something's not quite right here... I’m not just having a rant… I don’t know how it works, and would like to.
__________________ | ||
| | |
| | #2 | |||
| Believe it when I see it Admin. Join Date: 01-05-1999 Location: Southern England
Posts: 27724
Thanks: 34
Thanked 732 Times in 507 Posts
Blog Entries: 3 My System: Sky+, DB 7000s, Gemini 4.3 in flash, Var on USB stick. Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Unaohm EP313, Swires Annie 204 Spectrum, Rover ST-4 Spectrum. | The biggest problem with this, is that when something doesn't work, the privateer blames BT and BT blames the privateer, so it takes ages to get faults fixed/corrected. The other factor is that if people think BT's customer services are slow or hard to get hold of, wait until they try and contact Bulldog or AOL, there is also the added burden of AOL software ARGHHHH!.
__________________ | |||
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Spain to get 1,000 local DTT channels | net1 | Daily Satellite and Broadcast industry News | 1 | 19-08-2005 12:12 PM |
| HOTBIRD 4 satellite receiver questions | Balood | Digital systems | 6 | 05-04-2005 08:59 PM |
| questions on magic module | ez_livin | Magic Module | 13 | 10-06-2004 12:28 PM |
| Questions for the Cam experts | Samba65 | Cams and decoders General | 14 | 13-05-2004 03:00 PM |
| Magic CAM: what the future holds? | jimbo | Magic Module | 10 | 14-09-2003 08:22 PM |