 | |  |
| |||||||
Optimal konfiguration 4 rooms + 4 satellite positionsThis section is for discussion on domestic multi-receiver systems for distribution of both terrestrial and satellite signals. Multiswitch, diplexer, triplexer, earct bonding, smart Priority switch, signal splitter, SCART doubler, video sender, remote extender, etc. | |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-02-2009
| #1 | ||
| Member Join Date: 03-02-2009 Location: I am
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My System: who |
What is optimal konfiguration for 4 rooms + 4 satellite positions? I know these: "1 x antenna 4 x receivers (DiSEqC 1.0) 4 x Uni Quad LNB 4 x 4/1 DiSEqC" "1 x antenna 4 x receivers (DiSEqC 1.0) 4 x Uni Quattro LNB 2 x 9/4 multi switch 4 x 2/1 DiSEqC (option)" "1 x antenna 4 x receivers (DiSEqC 1.0) 4 x Uni Quattro LNB 1 x 17/4 multi switch" I think the best is last, can you write another. Can I use "Uni Single LNB" with another "multi switch"? Thank you! | ||
|  |
|
03-02-2009
| #2 | ||
| Super Moderator  Real name: Mark Join Date: 17-05-2007 Location: Kent,UK
Posts: 4493
Thanks: 76
Thanked 632 Times in 600 Posts
My System: TM6800HD, TM1000, TM600 Linux,TM5200, TM2200 motor, Triax TD110 dish + Fortec 85cm. Meter=Satlook Micro+G2 NIT | It depends on what you mean my 'optimal' ? Optimal in terms of cost and ease of replacement if a component fails is option 1. The 17 input multiswitches are fairly expensive. The cabling would be fairly simple too I think, if you put the Diseqc1.0 4x1's outside. | ||
| | |||
|
| |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| konfiguration, optimal, positions, rooms, satellite |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
