Receive Digital Terrestrial...

This section is for discussion on domestic multi-receiver systems for distribution of both terrestrial and satellite signals. Multiswitch, diplexer, triplexer, earct bonding, smart Priority switch, signal splitter, SCART doubler, video sender, remote extender, etc.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19-06-2009   #1
Member
 
Join Date: 26-08-2008
Location: UK, West Midlands
Posts: 37
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

My System: Visiosat Bisat Astra 19.2 (Central Focus), Astra 28.2 + Hotbird 13 satellites using Hauppauge NOVA HD-S2 + Fortec Star Passion receivers
Question Receive Digital Terrestrial...

Hello all,

Is it possible to receive digital terrestrial channels and convert them so they can be viewable on a FTA digital receiver (see My System on the left).
I am really pleased with my setup, but one channel I enjoy and miss is Dave. This is available either on Freeview (which is free) or Sky, which would involve me paying about £20 a month which is just silly.

On a seperate note, I'm often confused how Sky's business model will last and let me explain my theory Many channels rely on advertising to operate and generally speaking advertising rates on based on the number of viewers (which would make sense). Free to Air or Freesat viewing is increasing everyday so from an advertising/funding point of view being available on Sky and Freesat would surely benefit everyone? The public get to see more and channel ratings/viewings go up so more can be charged for advertising. Many thanks.
Prodigy81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2009   #2
Believe it when I see it Admin.
 
rolfw's Avatar
 
Real name: Rolf
Join Date: 01-05-1999
Location: Southern England
Posts: 29864
Thanks: 51
Thanked 1097 Times in 691 Posts
Blog Entries: 5

My System: Pace Sky HD, DM7000s, CubeRevo 3000HDPVR, Transparent 80cm Dish, Moteck SG2100 DiseqC motor, lots of legacy gear. Meters: Satlook Digital NIT, Televes H45 Digital Spectrum analyser.

To answer your question simply, no it isn't, but why would you want to?

Rolf
If you enjoy our site, you can help support it by wearing our unique branded merchandise, you can do this by clicking on my baseball cap, making a direct donation with Paypal by clicking on the Donation button below, or using our site supporting advertisers, to do this, click on the central image below. Follow us on Twitter, click on the twitter image.



rolfw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2009   #3
Dazed and Confused Mod
 
PaulR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 28-06-2003
Location: Wirral, NW England
Posts: 3489
Thanks: 1
Thanked 89 Times in 86 Posts

My System: Various digiboxes, broken Nokia 9800S, numerous analogue boxes. My lovely little lappy, HP Omnibook 6100

Well, just about anything is possible ifyou're prepared to throw enough money at the problem but realistically, the answer is no.

Why do you want to use the satellite receiver to view the terrestrial channel? Is it because it has a recording function? Or is to view it about the house?

I can't really think of any reason that can't be got around some other way.


With regards to $ly's policy, in the end it all comes down to money. While you might think that there isn't enough money from the subscription fees you're obviously wrong as I don't notice $ly passing round the begging bowl!

In fact the current financial situation has actually made $ly's position stronger as channels find their advertising revenue going down and having to rely more and more on a slice of the subscription. Things are so bad, in fact, that reportedly some channels which have been FTA are thinking of joining the $ly brigade!

PaulR
As I get older I find myself thinking about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.
PaulR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-2009   #4
Dazed and Confused Mod
 
PaulR's Avatar
 
Join Date: 28-06-2003
Location: Wirral, NW England
Posts: 3489
Thanks: 1
Thanked 89 Times in 86 Posts

My System: Various digiboxes, broken Nokia 9800S, numerous analogue boxes. My lovely little lappy, HP Omnibook 6100

For more about the channels possibly going encrypted see Rumour - some ITV & C4 channels to be encrypted

PaulR
As I get older I find myself thinking about the hereafter - I go into a room and then wonder what I'm here after.
PaulR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2009   #5
Member
 
Join Date: 26-08-2008
Location: UK, West Midlands
Posts: 37
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

My System: Visiosat Bisat Astra 19.2 (Central Focus), Astra 28.2 + Hotbird 13 satellites using Hauppauge NOVA HD-S2 + Fortec Star Passion receivers

To answer your question simply, no it isn't, but why would you want to?
Well in the example of Dave, it's available on Freeview and Sky. You cannot get it on Freesat. There are some satellite receivers which have dual tuners (digital terrestrial and digital satellite) so clearly there is a demand. It's also useful, especially as people are in a digital transition period for years to come. Only newer screens have Freeview/Freesat built in.

It's interesting that Sky themselves are paying channels. Firstly to help them financially but also to keep them exclusive to Sky. They may be able to do this for a while, but surely they'll come a time when even Sky's financial resources are exhausted.
You could debate that Sky are selling Sky HD at cost price (£50) or possibly even at a loss. I don't know what the statistics are in terms of customers and the number of packages they subscribe to, but not everyone will subscribe to the more profitable sports channels. I think profit margins are going to be much tighter than people think. I also wonder how many people have cancelled subscriptions due to losing jobs or other financial commitments.
Prodigy81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2009   #6
Member
 
Join Date: 26-08-2008
Location: UK, West Midlands
Posts: 37
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

My System: Visiosat Bisat Astra 19.2 (Central Focus), Astra 28.2 + Hotbird 13 satellites using Hauppauge NOVA HD-S2 + Fortec Star Passion receivers

On the subject of digital terrestrial and digital satellite, other than the main differences (an aerial and a dish) and the connections being different (although coax to f-plug adapters do exist).

This leaves primarily the difference in signal or frequency (if any). Surely a converter would be possible and could output the channels in a traditional fashion to a satellite receiver. Either directly or through a DiSEqC switch.
Prodigy81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-06-2009   #7
Archived Member
 
Join Date: 13-08-2007
Location: Middle East - Israel
Posts: 3774
Thanks: 192
Thanked 459 Times in 356 Posts

Originally Posted by Prodigy81 View Post
On the subject of digital terrestrial and digital satellite, other than the main differences (an aerial and a dish) and the connections being different (although coax to f-plug adapters do exist).

This leaves primarily the difference in signal or frequency (if any). Surely a converter would be possible and could output the channels in a traditional fashion to a satellite receiver. Either directly or through a DiSEqC switch.
The tuners have different design.
You would need to convert the terrestrial signal DVB-T to a satellite signal conforming to DVB-S and then feed it into the LNB input of the sat receiver.
If you are prepared to pay for the design of such a converter, then go ahead.
It will be cheaper to pay the £20/mo to Sky.
HB13DISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
digital, receive, terrestrial


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off







All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 AM.


All views and information expressed in users' communications and profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned and do not represent the views of Satellites.co.uk. All images and news content are believed to be in the public domain, except where otherwise stated. Forum software by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.1