Originally Posted by Huevos Looks like we are going around in circles here. |
We sure do
I don't have a standard Inverto Black Ultra here, but when I do I will run a direct test against the Darkgold. |
Cool, that would def be interesting.
I have never looked at a spec sheet for any of these LNB's. C/N figures come from my Satcatcher Excel-TV meter (post #24). |
Well reading post 24, C/N figures relate to the Darkgold and the Invacom. Not the Inverto. Reading the post 31 you say they also come from the Inverto ("The reason I like the Inverto is because I haven't seen a better C/N from any LNB on a prime focus dish."). Still you say you don't have an Inverto black ultra. What you're really meaning, is, you've never installed it on your dish, or you've never installed it on any dish, you've just plugged your meter to already installed dishes. Correct? You must recognise that for someone whose native tongue ain't english, his little head can get a bit screwed up sometimes. That's my case
I see the modified Inverto Black Ultra and all versions of the C120 Invacom on prime focus dishes on a daily basis.
Since the dishes are fixed sizes I know with each LNB and dish combination roughly what C/N to expect. |
You see them daily, but I'm not sure what you mean by "seeing". But nevermind.
I have never used an unmodified Inverto Black Ultra, but based on what I see daily with the modified version I would imagine that it is a damn good LNB.Also, some LNB's exhibit good C/N but selectively null out certain weak transponders. In my experience the Inverto does not suffer from this problem. |
Ok, I think I'm starting to understand what you're saying. You have never done a direct test between inverto and darkgold or invacom, but based on your C/N readings you believe it should perform better.
Cheerio and thanks for the infos, and please do keep us updated when you try it