Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
What's On, Transponder and channel support
Satellite Radio Channels
Radio Mars (30w)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1091570" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>Without the discussion deviating from the topic,you brought an example that emphasizes,if any,how difficult it is to be able to confirm or deny an information that you send to satellite sites.I ask,more rhetorically,how many of those who want to get a transponder posted on FlySat manage to lock these parameters so demanding,at least for many users,if they do not have devices,(big) antenna and favorable geographical position,as we find,say,at 8.W?This does not mean that the information sent on these sites should not be (re)checked,first of all by the respective sites.But this aspect,we must admit does not interest many users,and many satellite sites do not even complicate to post them.Only a minority of enthusiasts have material possibilities and time to check information posted.</p><p>And there is another aspect,a subjective one,which is related to these contributors,namely,how much more are they interested in feeding up to update the informations they send on this sites,for which they are not paid?They are rewarded only symbolically,i.e. they become known,then give up checking if the information sent once is still valid.And that's how old information remain, which is no longer up to date,and which attracts,as usual,criticism/blame from users for that site.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1091570, member: 297935"] Without the discussion deviating from the topic,you brought an example that emphasizes,if any,how difficult it is to be able to confirm or deny an information that you send to satellite sites.I ask,more rhetorically,how many of those who want to get a transponder posted on FlySat manage to lock these parameters so demanding,at least for many users,if they do not have devices,(big) antenna and favorable geographical position,as we find,say,at 8.W?This does not mean that the information sent on these sites should not be (re)checked,first of all by the respective sites.But this aspect,we must admit does not interest many users,and many satellite sites do not even complicate to post them.Only a minority of enthusiasts have material possibilities and time to check information posted. And there is another aspect,a subjective one,which is related to these contributors,namely,how much more are they interested in feeding up to update the informations they send on this sites,for which they are not paid?They are rewarded only symbolically,i.e. they become known,then give up checking if the information sent once is still valid.And that's how old information remain, which is no longer up to date,and which attracts,as usual,criticism/blame from users for that site. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
What's On, Transponder and channel support
Satellite Radio Channels
Radio Mars (30w)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top