satcat
Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 64
- My Satellite Setup
-
7KuQuads in T90 13/19/28/40/45/53°e(still tuning 5/26/36+1CirTwin/60/75°e) + Inverto, MTI, Smart 0,2 dB LNBs.
Receivers: Relook400s w LAN, Coship 5300, Force, Manhattan.
- My Location
- Gothenburg, Sweden
Which "signal-chain" setup is likely to return the strongest/best quality signal for a 4 user system?
1) Quad LNB => High isolation DiSEqC 4/1 switch => Spaun SUR 420 WSG DiSEqC 1.1 uncommitted switch => receiver
or
2) Quattro LNB => Multiswitch => Spaun SUR 420 WSG DiSEqC 1.1 uncommitted switch => receiver
I could go either way in order to receive Badr 4 at 26E but would like to know if any of You have experiensed a difference between 1 and 2 above?
3) Which Quad or Quattro do You recommend?
I live at the edge of the reception footprint with about 43 dBW from Badr 4 according to LyngSat.
Kind regards,
satcat
1) Quad LNB => High isolation DiSEqC 4/1 switch => Spaun SUR 420 WSG DiSEqC 1.1 uncommitted switch => receiver
or
2) Quattro LNB => Multiswitch => Spaun SUR 420 WSG DiSEqC 1.1 uncommitted switch => receiver
I could go either way in order to receive Badr 4 at 26E but would like to know if any of You have experiensed a difference between 1 and 2 above?
3) Which Quad or Quattro do You recommend?
I live at the edge of the reception footprint with about 43 dBW from Badr 4 according to LyngSat.
Kind regards,
satcat