Diseqc or multiswitch for fringe reception?

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
Hi!

I have searched the boards, but there does not seem to be a definitive answer for this.

What is best for fringe reception, a regular quad/diseqc setup, or quattro/multiswitch? I have heard that you are supposed to increase the dish size a little when using mulitswitches, but is there really any truth to this?

The diseqc switches I currently use has an insertion loss of typically 5db:
http://www.emp-centauri.cz/index.php?lang=en&page=prodview&id_kateg=1&id_pkateg=21&id=82

The Multiswitch I am looking at has a loss of 3 db:
http://www.emp-centauri.cz/index.php?lang=en&page=prodview&id_kateg=1&id_pkateg=15&id=75

In addition to this, the internal switch in the quad LNB is removed, so shouldn't it be even more loss reduction? Does anyone have experience with changing over from a "normal" setup to a multiswitch setup?

Regards

Tommy
 

satelliteman

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
12,039
Reaction score
387
Points
83
My Satellite Setup
See signature
My Location
Northants, Midlands UK & Lanzarote, Canary Islands
Difficult to say for fringe reception but a Quattro, multi switch arrangement may inherit more noise on the system over a quad and DiSEqC.
 

PaulR

Dazed and Confused Admin
Staff member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
18,023
Reaction score
4,046
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
-----------See sig-----------
My Location
Wirral, NW UK and Vaucluse, France.
Gut feeling says that quad and (good) DiSeqc will be better probably because of the wider choice of LNB giving a better quality launch signal into the Diseqc switch.

It should be the other way round because, as you say, there is less circuitry but I suspect that the multiswitch and quattro are optimised for strong signal areas.
 

Clown man

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
73
Reaction score
61
Points
18
My Satellite Setup
28,2 & 19,2 on Gibby 150cm ..2x Opticum Premium LNB's....Opticum 5x12 Multiswitch....Humax Freesat HDR's custom FW ...Pioneer Kuro & Panasonic Viera W60 Plasma tv's
My Location
Munich.....Germany......
That "EMP Centauri multiswitch" ....works fine with Quad or Quattro LNB's...so LNB choice is not a Problem.......

Personally don't have much Thu loss ( if any)... using my Opticum Multiswitch/Invacom Quattro c120 .. compared to a direct Quad LNB..

....The EMP is a very good Multiswitch with built in signal attenuators...something that my Opticum multiswitch sadly lacks...
 

4wd

Getting the picture
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
2,203
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
5 W, 9-13-19-28 E
My Location
Bergen, Norway \ Alpes Maritimes, France
off topic att. satkingno, how's 28.2 at your location, post a report in Sky & Freesat fringe reception ?
 

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
I am currently at work offshore 4wd, but will post some figures after I get home over the weekend.
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,036
Reaction score
1,273
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
The diseqc switches I currently use has an insertion loss of typically 5db
That is insertion loss so is not relevant to this discussion. Important thing is SNR, and I've never seen a DiSEqC switch, even a cheap one, that lowers SNR by more than 0.1dB, unless it is broken.
 

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
Okay, I see...so the bottom line is that there's so little, if any, to gain on a multiswitch vs diseqc setup, that it's simply not worth it?
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,036
Reaction score
1,273
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
Okay, I see...so the bottom line is that there's so little, if any, to gain on a multiswitch vs diseqc setup, that it's simply not worth it?
Not really, but their purpose is different. A multiswitch is to raise the number of feeds above four. A DiSEqC switch is so a single feed can access more than one LNB.
 

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
Yes, don't really need more than eight feeds, so switching to octo LNB's would suffice then. Just thought there was something to gain on the signal maybe. Well, this has been very helpful, thanks a lot to all who replied! :)
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,036
Reaction score
1,273
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
Most octos are ****
 

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
Oh really? So if there is a need for more than 4 feeds, you would recommend quattro/multiswitch?
 

Huevos

Satellite Freak
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
6,036
Reaction score
1,273
Points
113
My Satellite Setup
57E to 58W, C-band and Ku, DVB-S2, 4:2:2 and blindscan.
My Location
38.5ºN, 0.5ºW
Oh really? So if there is a need for more than 4 feeds, you would recommend quattro/multiswitch?
Just get what is within your budget. If you can receive the channels you want to watch for most people that is good enough. And with digital even if the LNB is crap and noisy, as long as error correction can sort it out the picture will be perfect.
 

satkingno

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
28
Reaction score
8
Points
3
Age
52
My Satellite Setup
Vu+ Duo2, Vu+ Solo2, Vu+ SoloSE, Wavefrontier T90 1W-5E-9E-10E-13E-16E-19E-23.5E, Channel Master 1.2m 28.2E 4xEMP Centauri 9/1, 8x Inverto Black Ultra Quad
My Location
Norway
Ok, thanks Huevos!
 

Terryl

Specialist Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
1,932
Points
113
Age
82
My Satellite Setup
OpenBox X5 on a 1 meter motorized dish.
And now a 10 foot "C" band dish.

Custom built PC
My Location
Deep in the Boonies in the central Sierra Nevada mountains of California.
Anything inserted inline will attenuate the overall signal, so if you want the maximum signal for looking for those hard to get DX signals then a direct connection from the LNB to the receiver is the best setup.

.6 dB or 3 dB insertion loss it's still that much closer to the over all noise floor.
 
Top