Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Receiver software, international Section
Fastest Blind Scan HD Receiver
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="william-1" data-source="post: 887638" data-attributes="member: 193781"><p>I have to agree with you I have just set up the TM6900HD Combo Super+ for a comparison to the TM5402HD M3 & yes the M3 does miss some transponders that the 6900 finds maybe something to do with the faster speed blind search of the M3 & the Korean build is superior to the Chinese build,</p><p></p><p>The picture quality of the M1 & TM6900HD Super+ is much better than the M3 & F3/5 using cheaper components even with all the added video controls the product is not as good as it could be with a better quality build & higher quality components but as the TM5402HD brand name is a big seller despite the Blind Scan 45,000 symbol rate error when a low symbol rate is in use in the M1,M2,DrHD D15,Blade7000s versions, (Never corrected by the way)</p><p></p><p>So TM decided to build the new TM5402HD M3 based on the old TM3000 hardware thus eliminating the 45,000 symbol rate error but introducing the new data base error with loads of transponders being added to the data base that are not active & do not exist <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sad.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Sad :(" data-shortname=":(" /> Had this been 10 years ago we would have been very pleased as 90% of today's customers are with the new M3,</p><p></p><p>But enthusiasts like myself would not have to keep going back to the older better quality build of the TM6900HD ect if the new products were better & faster is not better if you do not have enough circuits to process the data correctly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="william-1, post: 887638, member: 193781"] I have to agree with you I have just set up the TM6900HD Combo Super+ for a comparison to the TM5402HD M3 & yes the M3 does miss some transponders that the 6900 finds maybe something to do with the faster speed blind search of the M3 & the Korean build is superior to the Chinese build, The picture quality of the M1 & TM6900HD Super+ is much better than the M3 & F3/5 using cheaper components even with all the added video controls the product is not as good as it could be with a better quality build & higher quality components but as the TM5402HD brand name is a big seller despite the Blind Scan 45,000 symbol rate error when a low symbol rate is in use in the M1,M2,DrHD D15,Blade7000s versions, (Never corrected by the way) So TM decided to build the new TM5402HD M3 based on the old TM3000 hardware thus eliminating the 45,000 symbol rate error but introducing the new data base error with loads of transponders being added to the data base that are not active & do not exist :( Had this been 10 years ago we would have been very pleased as 90% of today's customers are with the new M3, But enthusiasts like myself would not have to keep going back to the older better quality build of the TM6900HD ect if the new products were better & faster is not better if you do not have enough circuits to process the data correctly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Receiver software, international Section
Fastest Blind Scan HD Receiver
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top