I am very short sighted too. The combination of passive 3d 4k upscaling and the very light cheap glasses or clip ons is much better than active 3d. You also don't get the strobbing from external light sources and I have not seen any evidence of the dreaded crosstalk whick plagued active systems.
I am just lightly short-sighted, but have astigmatism in both eyes. Different major diretcions for left and right.
I have major problems seeing 3D with the active glasses I got with the 3D set.
I have problems seeing the 3D effects even from passive glasses they hand out at the Cinemas.
I have been assured by eye-doctor and spectable pusher that I probably can't see the 3D effect no matter what.
And I usually leave a 3D film with a head-ache, whether it is on the couch or in the theatre.
Actually, that's wrong, as I don't leave a 3D film anymore. No point in going in the first place.
I wish someone would wake up to the fact that "the next big thing" is not 3D, 4K, HDR, OLED, whaever.
the nextg big thing is more RELEVANT tv.
I will happily watch re-runs of my favourite program in SD, as long as it is now, and I want it badly.
The US Republican, erhm, qualifying rounds (for lack of a better term) are not more entertaining because they're in HD...
...they're entertaining because they have Idiot Trump in them! SD/HD doesn't matter! 3D/HDR/4K is completely irrelevant! You can watch it on low-bitrate youtube and it is *still* entertaining!