Suffering fools, so you don't have to.
- My Satellite Setup
- A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
- My Location
- UK South
which ziwell are you using i have 15k but titanium works better for me but its strange dreambox cant lock with such signalYes, I locked it with both Zinwell LNB and Titanium LNB using Dr HD F15 receiver. I have attached a picture below of the scan result from 40.5W in C band comparing the Zinwell LNB with the Titanium LNB.
which ziwell are you using i have 15k but titanium works better for me but its strange dreambox cant lock with such signal
with titanium and policarbonato dielectric 40 tp locked i think there is on sat 43 good results with titanium.
The zinwell is different is 15k and 67db gain
I have attached a table below that presents some signal levels from 40.5W measured using different scalar ring positions along the feed barrel and different distances of the feed barrel from the dish.
Dish = Precision 2.0m prime focus, focal length of 755mm
Feed = AV-COMM polo pipe
LNB = Titanium PLL LNB inserted into polo pipe
Receiver = Dr HD F15
The table shows some trends suggesting the optimum feed distance is ~ 745mm to 750mm but also contains an anomalous result suggesting the optimum feed distance is 755mm.
View attachment 125895
Great reference table MB. I also find the skew between those frequencies differs somewhat.
It sure would MBYes, I am not quite sure if there are some artefacts being introduced by the polo pipe in the process of transforming the circular wave to a linear wave. A repeat of the test without the polo pipe using just the LNBF with a dielectric plate might be informative?