SEOShamsher
Member
- My Satellite Setup
- Past setup:
• 8-ft dish covering 68.5°E, 75.0°E (Ku), 78.5°E, 83.5°E, 90.0°E, 93.5°E (Ku), 100°E, 105.5°E, 115.0°E
• 6-ft dish at 49.0°E
• Receivers: COSHIP CDVB2000B, Dish TV Zinga
Current status:
Sold all equipment — want to start again from scratch.
- My Location
- Ludhiana, Punjab, India
Hi all,
I need some advice from those who have real hands-on experience comparing different dish sizes and types.
I’m currently looking at picking up a few dishes:
Right now, I’m mainly focused on signal comparison on weak satellites, especially those very low on the horizon (0–1° elevation), where performance really matters.
I’m a bit confused because I’ve heard very mixed opinions:
All pics are attached —
12 ft (iron, older),
9 ft (aluminum, cleaner),
and both 6 ft fiber options.
Would really appreciate your input, especially from anyone who has tested these sizes side by side on weak signals.
Thanks
I need some advice from those who have real hands-on experience comparing different dish sizes and types.
I’m currently looking at picking up a few dishes:
- 12 ft prime focus KU (iron, looks older)
- 9 ft prime focus KU (aluminum, much cleaner and better condition)
- 6 ft fiber dish (likely Prodelin) — actually there are two different sellers offering the same 6 ft fiber, so I’ll be inspecting both
Right now, I’m mainly focused on signal comparison on weak satellites, especially those very low on the horizon (0–1° elevation), where performance really matters.
I’m a bit confused because I’ve heard very mixed opinions:
- Some say a 6 ft Prodelin-type fiber dish can outperform larger dishes due to better design and efficiency
- Others told me the 12 ft is built in the older style (deeper ~0.7 f/D ratio) and may not be as efficient
- From the pictures, the 9 ft aluminum dish actually looks much better in shape less deep and condition, while the 12 ft looks quite old
- Has anyone here directly compared 6 ft fiber vs 9 ft or 12 ft prime focus dishes on weak satellites?
- Can a 6 ft Prodelin perform anywhere close to a 9 ft or 12 ft, especially at very low elevation signals?
- For multi-LNB setups, can a 6 ft perform similarly to larger dishes, or do 9 ft / 12 ft clearly have an advantage?
- In real-world use, what matters more — dish size or dish accuracy/condition?
- 1 large dish (either 9 ft or 12 ft)
- 1–2 × 6 ft fiber dishes
All pics are attached —
12 ft (iron, older),
9 ft (aluminum, cleaner),
and both 6 ft fiber options.
Would really appreciate your input, especially from anyone who has tested these sizes side by side on weak signals.
Thanks
Attachments
-
6 fiber offset 1 (2).webp118 KB · Views: 50 -
6 fiber offset 1.webp66.2 KB · Views: 48 -
6 ft fiber 2nd option.webp202.5 KB · Views: 44 -
6 ft fiber 2nd option.jpeg.webp212.4 KB · Views: 39 -
9ft.webp102.1 KB · Views: 37 -
9ft.jpeg (2).webp43 KB · Views: 34 -
9ft.jpeg.webp63.4 KB · Views: 32 -
12 ft Iron.webp124.3 KB · Views: 32 -
12 ft Iron.jpeg (2).webp256.4 KB · Views: 35 -
12 ft Iron.jpeg (3).webp151.1 KB · Views: 48