Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Fringe Reception General
Best receivers for weak transponders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satesco" data-source="post: 1035498" data-attributes="member: 297935"><p>I agree with this way of putting the problem.Introducing the latest technology in receivers is a must for manufacturers if they want to stay on the market.But,unfortunately,they're only interested in the commercial part of their products.And for this reason the focus is put on the side of the media than for the reception,as it was when appeared the first digital receivers.Now such a receiver must provide the buyer everything found in a tv or devices,ie:,access to any media content(youtube,RSS,all kind of streams,etc).And let's not forget a very important thing,the focus is on the streams once the offer of tv programs increases with the spread of IPTV.</p><p>So the focus is now on this content and not on the ability of the receivers to detect weak signals and to lock them up. And for this reason, I ask more rhetorical,what manufacturer will produce receivers for a minority of people(dxers) only interested by the signal?And there is a another reason why they do not make receivers for dxers,that is,they must <u>always provide them with software support!</u> From this point of view many commercial receivers are morally worn out even if they are functional.They have a short life,a couple of years as long as the support is secured,then you can throw them.Do you remember <a href="http://www.sat-center.gr/en/audio-visual/receivers/satellite/lyngbox.html" target="_blank"> Lyngbox </a> in 2006,especially made for dexrs?Who else is interested in such a receiver these days?</p><p>Here are some reasons why I agree with you that it will not be a special receiver for dxers.</p><p>That's why a dvbs card adapts more easily to technological changes in this area.If it is endowed with the main hardwares components,then the rest makes the computer in which it is installed.</p><p>I hope I'm not right about the future of satellite receivers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satesco, post: 1035498, member: 297935"] I agree with this way of putting the problem.Introducing the latest technology in receivers is a must for manufacturers if they want to stay on the market.But,unfortunately,they're only interested in the commercial part of their products.And for this reason the focus is put on the side of the media than for the reception,as it was when appeared the first digital receivers.Now such a receiver must provide the buyer everything found in a tv or devices,ie:,access to any media content(youtube,RSS,all kind of streams,etc).And let's not forget a very important thing,the focus is on the streams once the offer of tv programs increases with the spread of IPTV. So the focus is now on this content and not on the ability of the receivers to detect weak signals and to lock them up. And for this reason, I ask more rhetorical,what manufacturer will produce receivers for a minority of people(dxers) only interested by the signal?And there is a another reason why they do not make receivers for dxers,that is,they must [u]always provide them with software support![/u] From this point of view many commercial receivers are morally worn out even if they are functional.They have a short life,a couple of years as long as the support is secured,then you can throw them.Do you remember [url=http://www.sat-center.gr/en/audio-visual/receivers/satellite/lyngbox.html] Lyngbox [/url] in 2006,especially made for dexrs?Who else is interested in such a receiver these days? Here are some reasons why I agree with you that it will not be a special receiver for dxers. That's why a dvbs card adapts more easily to technological changes in this area.If it is endowed with the main hardwares components,then the rest makes the computer in which it is installed. I hope I'm not right about the future of satellite receivers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
Fringe Reception General
Best receivers for weak transponders
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top