BSkyB Closes Sky Magazine

Rachel_Sandford

News Hound
Earlier this year, BSkyB announced that it would be discontinuing publication of Sky Sports Magazine and Sky Movies Magazine. Both magazines were launched in January 2007, with the former being produced in-house and the latter being published by Future Publishing. Up until the time they were discontinued, both magazines enjoyed a circulation of four million subscribers.

As part of the changes, the broadcaster also announced that they would be changing Sky Magazine, Britain's biggest circulation title, to a quarterly magazine instead of a monthly one beginning August of this year. Now, however, it seems that Sky has changed its mind altogether. Sky Magazine subscribers have all been given letters explaining that Sky Magazine is also closing.

The magazine, which had a peak distribution of nearly eight million a month just two years ago, is no longer profitable for Sky. Given Postcomm's approval of increasing the Royal Mail's prices for bulk mail as well as the increasing price of paper, cost for printing has gone up. Ans since Sky has frozen subscriber prices for 12 months, they do need to cut costs and save money. Cutting the magazine is definitely one way to do this.

“We considered publishing a quarterly customer magazine to replace the monthly Sky Magazine,” said a Sky spokesperson. “But as a company that sits at the heart of digital entertainment and communications, we've decided to follow our customers online. Web and mobile platforms offer us a more immediate and engaging way to communicate with our customers, so this is our focus moving forward.”

This year also saw the launch of a weekly email for Sky subscribers called My Sky Week. This was packed with information on programme highlights, and it also offered links for content typically found in their magazines. The company also provided a TV Guide on Sky.com and created a customer service mobile app for its subscribers.


It is not known how many have lost their jobs due to the closures of the magazine or if the web platforms have absorbed any of the jobs.
 
They should have done this years ago if the content within the magazine was useful, either sticking the content online, or listed as an additional subscriber channel within the satellite platform.

It makes absolute sense to have less stuff (that nobody can confirm is actually read) coming through the door, having made a journey that starts from a tree being felled, through the processing/printing/bulk distribution depot, eventually ending up at some landfill site, having sapped a huge amount of energy enroute.
 
In this household it comes in through the front door and out through the back to the dustbin, only interrupted in its journey via the kitchen litter bin.

A shocking waste of resources.
 
Same here Llew, off comes the plastic wrap and straight into the recycling basket.
 
IIRC, one of the advantages (To BSkyB, not to the punters) of publishing the mag. was some sort of tax benefit - although the subs. punters pay includes an element for the cost of production.

So are subscribers now going to see a price drop of a pound or so .................................... ????
 
IIARC it's to do with VAT. Newsprint and books are zero rated so $ly could claim a portion of the VAT back on the monthly subs which, of course, went into further quality programming.
 
The vat loophole was closed a few years ago.

Delighted to hear the mag has gone - one less thing to chuck in the recycling bin
 
Ah, ok.

I am very old indeed.
 
Well if you lot and myself just chuck them in the bin then someone must have a rare collectors items stashed in a garage somewhere.
 
Is it true they charged for it and noone bought it so they put up the subscriptions and made it free?
 
Analoguesat said:
The vat loophole was closed a few years ago.
That decision was reversed when Sky pointed out in court that other companies were using the same loophole and Sky have been paying less VAT ever since
 
fergyc said:
Is it true they charged for it and noone bought it so they put up the subscriptions and made it free?
There was a subscription for it of £2 odd but that entitled subscribers to the same reduction on their TV subscription - so basically zero cost to subscriber. Sky got the production and distribution costs from the advertising revenue from the magazine - it had the largest distribution of any UK magazine (regardless of how many actually read it) and that figure counts for advertising revenue.
 
davemurgtroyd said:
it had the largest distribution of any UK magazine (regardless of how many actually read it) and that figure counts for advertising revenue.
Some years ago my mother provided a UK address for her brother who lived in Spain so that he could get a $ly card. As a result, of course, a magazine was regularly delivered.

Knowing I was interested in sastellite reception she passed a few on to me. I tried to read one but it was absolutely dreadful. After that it was straight in the bin (no recycling back then).
 
Back
Top