Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Dreambox Support Forum
CCCam or gbox
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prophessor" data-source="post: 534356" data-attributes="member: 206821"><p>Between the 2 i would say this</p><p>.cccam</p><p>- very stable on nds on hop1 </p><p>- very bandwith hungry be prepared for a few gigs\month</p><p>- very good speeds on hop1, instant, all providers</p><p>- not very compatible with high speed downloads, lost of breaks in nds, fine on the others</p><p>- really hates lag, the fewer peers you have the better, on my box 30 peers runs smoothly</p><p>- can be harder to setup, depending on your particular needs, it has lots of options and settings to play with</p><p>- can't have cccam on XP</p><p></p><p>.6b0x</p><p>- fast</p><p>- not as realiable as cccam</p><p>- low bandwith consumption</p><p>- sucks in nds, good on the rest</p><p>- instant speeds on seca, nagra</p><p>- not as picky with dists, dist2 almost as good as dist1 on most providers (excluding nds)</p><p>- lag is not such a big issue as ccam</p><p>- can't handle nagra3 as well as cccam</p><p></p><p>If 6b0x were as stable and as good on nds and n3 as cccam there would be no need for the later. A few things might be missing on this comparison but i think it can give you an idea of what to expect.</p><p>Go for cccam.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prophessor, post: 534356, member: 206821"] Between the 2 i would say this .cccam - very stable on nds on hop1 - very bandwith hungry be prepared for a few gigs\month - very good speeds on hop1, instant, all providers - not very compatible with high speed downloads, lost of breaks in nds, fine on the others - really hates lag, the fewer peers you have the better, on my box 30 peers runs smoothly - can be harder to setup, depending on your particular needs, it has lots of options and settings to play with - can't have cccam on XP .6b0x - fast - not as realiable as cccam - low bandwith consumption - sucks in nds, good on the rest - instant speeds on seca, nagra - not as picky with dists, dist2 almost as good as dist1 on most providers (excluding nds) - lag is not such a big issue as ccam - can't handle nagra3 as well as cccam If 6b0x were as stable and as good on nds and n3 as cccam there would be no need for the later. A few things might be missing on this comparison but i think it can give you an idea of what to expect. Go for cccam. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Dreambox Support Forum
CCCam or gbox
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top