https://www.lyngsat.com/packages/DSTV-Africa.html
http://www.lyngsat-maps.com/footprints/Eutelsat-36B-Sub-Sahara-Africa.html
There is often a marked difference in reception footprint capabilities when comparing theoretical to reality and there can be any number of reasons for it12245H receivable with 120cm (in the UK)?
What's the explanation for that and why not the other sub-sahara transponders?(some have even better FEC).