Manikm909
Small'ish Dish Man
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Messages
- 2,434
- Reaction score
- 1,143
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 47
- My Satellite Setup
- Channel Master 1.8M on Edision MIO 4K & GTMEDIA Combo, and CM1.2M on Octagon SF8008
- My Location
- Kent, UK
have you noticed, that some HD channels same FEC \ bitrate \ frame rate/res \ etc, can appear inferior in quality to others which are catgeorised as HD
i compared a few on TurkSat tonight, and interestingly, the channels which appear more HD, and "less" blocky - have something called ITU-R BT.709 in the stream.
Color primaries: ITU-R BT.709
Color transfer function: ITU-R BT.709
Colour space: ITU-R BT.709
i googled it, and its some kind of standard, i always though it was a bitrate issue, as to why some appear better than others.
an interesting find anyway.
PS the channels i compared were TV100 HD, and KANAL 7 AVRUPA HD on 42e - FTA
over, and out.
i compared a few on TurkSat tonight, and interestingly, the channels which appear more HD, and "less" blocky - have something called ITU-R BT.709 in the stream.
Color primaries: ITU-R BT.709
Color transfer function: ITU-R BT.709
Colour space: ITU-R BT.709
i googled it, and its some kind of standard, i always though it was a bitrate issue, as to why some appear better than others.
an interesting find anyway.
PS the channels i compared were TV100 HD, and KANAL 7 AVRUPA HD on 42e - FTA
over, and out.