Advice Needed Receivers with the lowest Symbol Rate?

manikm909 said:
is there a chance the feed wasnt live at the time, or did you run the scans at the same time....which is quicker.
Click to expand...
Ran at the same time
 
I have 8 receivers and they all behave differently and find a varying amount of channels with blind scan. The one that seems to find the most is the SF8008 with the SX88 firmware. I don't think with that firmware though, it will scan below a 1000 maybe 1500 on symbol rates but the DM900 does.. Horses for courses..
 
scopus said:
I have 8 receivers and they all behave differently and find a varying amount of channels with blind scan. The one that seems to find the most is the SF8008 with the SX88 firmware. I don't think with that firmware though, it will scan below a 1000 maybe 1500 on symbol rates but the DM900 does.. Horses for courses..
Click to expand...
do you actually have an sx88 to compare it with the sx88 image in slot
 
Last edited:
scopus said:
I have 8 receivers and they all behave differently and find a varying amount of channels with blind scan. The one that seems to find the most is the SF8008 with the SX88 firmware. I don't think with that firmware though, it will scan below a 1000 maybe 1500 on symbol rates but the DM900 does.. Horses for courses..
Click to expand...


Hi friend. I have sx88 and sx88+. Do you know if sf8008 accepts (manually input) SR below 1000 and max 80.000? Or only 1000 and 60.000?

And how about blindscan sf8008? (Defined OS and Enigma2) 1 ~60 too? Acoording support, sf8008 find 100 ~ 80.000

I have h9, h9 twin, zero4k and, appear only 1 to 60 (OpenATV).

Using blindscan, h9/h9twin/zero4k find only 1 ~ 45.

Sx88/SX88+ find 1 ~ 47500.
 
Last edited:
I need good receiver to do "C blindscan". H9s/twin show wrong ranges for C band. Work only Ku band.

See here my tests h9s. This week I'm testing my new h9 twin, but same wrong C blindscan.

github.com

Blindscan "C band" Zgemma h9s · Issue #85 · zgemma-star/meta-zgemma

Hi. We have a problem using dmm binary for blindscan. It's necessary new bin file. Here, a lot of problems related, then, I have some logs: For more details, see this post: https://forums.openpli.o...
github.com github.com

I'm watching a lot of videos about: Edision Os Mio 4k/4k+, SF8008, Amiko Viper 4k and Ustym 4k pro for good "C blindscan", but I don't know if support symbol rates 0 ~ 80, 0 ~ 60, 1 ~ 60, 1 ~ 80, 0 ~ 45 or 1 ~ 45.

I don't know if sf8008 accept only manual scan 100 ~ 80.000 acording support.

Sorry my english.
 
Last edited:
frankviana said:
Hi friend. I have sx88 and sx88+. Do you know if sf8008 accepts (manually input) SR below 1000 and max 80.000? Or only 1000 and 60.000?

And how about blindscan sf8008? (Defined OS and Enigma2) 1 ~60 too? Acoording support, sf8008 find 100 ~ 80.000

I have h9, h9 twin, zero4k and, appear only 1 to 60 (OpenATV).

Using blindscan, h9/h9twin/zero4k find only 1 ~ 45.

Sx88/SX88+ find 1 ~ 47500.
Click to expand...
Yes it certainly does..here is some radio stations off 23E it downloads with a manual..Not sure of the upper limit..P1010017.webp
 
-7 degrees here tomorrow as well.
 
scopus said:
Yes it certainly does..here is some radio stations off 23E it downloads with a manual..Not sure of the upper limit..View attachment 134508
Click to expand...
@Channel Hopper said that 940 SR - might just be an approximation of the 1000 SR lower limit, which is a fair point.
we need something in the 200 - 800 range to be sure....im happy to test if someone could point me to a lower SR TP
 
ozumo said:
5 west 11458H 542 & 11465H 667
Click to expand...
coming in loud (Octagon SF8008) and clear at 16.5db, its a shame the blind scan doesnt go lower than 1000 in E2
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20210210_084718418.webp
    PXL_20210210_084718418.webp
    27.2 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
neither my SF8008 (E2) - nor my SX88 (non E2) can lock that one mate - not sure if its just a signal issue or an low SR issue
 
RustySpoons said:
Does anyone know if there are any receivers that can do Symbol rates in kS/s ranges below 1000,
I know that some PCI cards can do it, but are there any receivers that are able to go really low in the 100's range
Click to expand...

there are two scenarios here:
a) Which STB's can manually handle lower than 1000SR TP's (i.e manually input)
b) Which STB's FIND lower than 1000SR TP's on a blindscan.
 
manikm909 said:
there are two scenarios here:
a) Which STB's can manually handle lower than 1000SR TP's (i.e manually input)
b) Which STB's FIND lower than 1000SR TP's on a blindscan.
Click to expand...

If I remember, PurE2 or SatdreamGR blindscan start search: 00 and end search: 60. OpenATV start search 01 to 60 only.
 
frankviana said:
If I remember, PurE2 or SatdreamGR blindscan start search: 00 and end search: 60. OpenATV start search 01 to 60 only.
Click to expand...
interesting, so different images use different blindscan plugins! never knew that
 
manikm909 said:
interesting, so different images use different blindscan plugins! never knew that
Click to expand...

Yes, different python code (00 ~ 60 or 01 ~ 60) and same binary to scan...

My Vu+ Zero 4k, own blindscan binary (vuplus bindscan) and save to .xml

Zgemma h9s/twin, (dmm blindscan binary outdated) and only work Ku Band...
 
Back
Top