solly
Specialist Contributor
- My Location
- Tel Aviv, Israel
El fin de la TV por satélite se acerca
Los años de vida de la televisión por satélite siguen bajando con la idea de Sky UK de pasar casi todo su servicio a streaming en 3 años.
To be honest I doubt the satellittes will be replaced. There hasnt been any news on any replacements. One may be kept in service using a MEV spacetug as the satellite service winds down and if enough long term contracts are signed its possible one new satellite could be put into service but there certainly wont be 3 new satellites for 28E. The shareholders in SES will never sanction multi million pound replacements that could not possibly earn the vast build launch & operational fees that modern satellites require.some information not clear bicose sky uk will be replace satellite
u dont know when replace 2e 2f 2g ?
2 i got same information moviestar move uhd this september
Satellite reception could never be relegated until cable delivered services are immune to attack.To be honest I doubt the satellittes will be replaced. There hasnt been any news on any replacements. One may be kept in service using a MEV spacetug as the satellite service winds down and if enough long term contracts are signed its possible one new satellite could be put into service but there certainly wont be 3 new satellites for 28E. The shareholders in SES will never sanction multi million pound replacements that could not possibly earn the vast build launch & operational fees that modern satellites require.
Sadly the futture is IPTV & we are in the golden age of tv delivery via satellite. Make the most of our hobby as its now an endangered species - the satellite tv landscape will look vastly different in 20 years time with far fewer tv satellites & orbital slots in use..
That is irrelevant to the broadcasters. Its cheaper to broadcast via iptv rather than rent transponders which cost millions of £ / Eu / $ per year. Plus they have all the advantages of instant audience research when using iptv delivery - as Ive mentioned in a previous thread..Satellite is the best reliable broadcasting way till now. Optical fiber is good, fast but full of unpredictable problems as interruptions, due to roadworks and road excavations, fires and natural disasters. Optical fiber network is a complete mess (as it is structured), just one cut and many services are affected in many countries at the same time. Satellite signals are point to point, apart rain disturb (only for KU Band,not C Band).
The golden age of hobby satellite tv is at least 10 years in the past. Folk in general arent interested in having dishes to watch exotic countries. And for the vanishingly small % that have a passing interest its probably available on a web stream. Who would have thought a few years ago you can watch North Korean TV any time you want to just with a few mouse clicks on your computer or taps on your tablet.When 28e shuts down 19.2 might bring the satellite hobbie back in fashion in the UK.
For sure. I work for tv, with signals and trasmissions, since last 90's, and I can tell that today there is no priority about quality. The most important thing for a broadcaster and customers is to appear, to see and nothing else. Quality and reliability are the last target. Today it's better to save money than appear in a good and safe way. That's why many many channels around the world today have no quality image, just a few Kb/s......That is irrelevant to the broadcasters. Its cheaper to broadcast via iptv rather than rent transponders which cost millions of £ / Eu / $ per year. Plus they have all the advantages of instant audience research when using iptv delivery - as Ive mentioned in a previous thread..
The mantra of Murdoch in the 80's, winning over BSB.For sure. I work for tv, with signals and trasmissions, since last 90's, and I can tell that today there is no priority about quality. The most important thing for a broadcaster and customers is to appear, to see and nothing else. Quality and reliability are the last target. Today it's better to save money than appear in a good and safe way. That's why many many channels around the world today have no quality image, just a few Kb/s......
For those with access to 58W.The golden age of hobby satellite tv is at least 10 years in the past. Folk in general arent interested in having dishes to watch exotic countries. And for the vanishingly small % that have a passing interest its probably available on a web stream. Who would have thought a few years ago you can watch North Korean TV any time you want to just with a few mouse clicks on your computer or taps on your tablet.
But isn't It too risky for a pay tv with so many subscribers to rely on a MEV mission or a single satellite with no backup?To be honest I doubt the satellittes will be replaced. There hasnt been any news on any replacements. One may be kept in service using a MEV spacetug as the satellite service winds down and if enough long term contracts are signed its possible one new satellite could be put into service but there certainly wont be 3 new satellites for 28E. The shareholders in SES will never sanction multi million pound replacements that could not possibly earn the vast build launch & operational fees that modern satellites require.
Sadly the futture is IPTV & we are in the golden age of tv delivery via satellite. Make the most of our hobby as its now an endangered species - the satellite tv landscape will look vastly different in 20 years time with far fewer tv satellites & orbital slot
But thats the point - Sky have plans to wind down the satellite service & move everyone over to iptv delivery. They wont need 30 or 40 transponders a few years from now. No doubt channels will start being cut from the satellite service to ahem persuade people to start moving over. Just like they did when Sky analogue was being run down.But isn't It too risky for a pay tv with so many subscribers to rely on a MEV mission or a single satellite with no backup?
In my opinion, Sky would require at least two new satellites at 28.2 E to renew its contract with SES.