The GTMedia box finds two active signals when scanning btw.
That will improve things in the footprint, if only the number of individuals able to view.Reception is stronger here, also just one SID but without name.
By the way not 8PSK but QPSK.
If TID is checked in PAT (TID-50) and SDT (TID-1) - the name is not displayed, if TID is not checked (or only SDT is read) the name is displayed.I reported this to Flysat yesterday, but it's not been updated yet. It's been there a few days now. Strangely, it doesn't give a channel ID when scanned with my Octagon, or with SmartDVB, AltDVB etc, but it does with CrazyScan an TSReader!



And there it is.It does look to be a mirror of the Reuters feed on SES4,.
There may be a new contract in place, or perhaps something important soon that cannot be reached on 22W.
Give or take a megacycle.yes, 12645V is correct
It would be useful to know your most accurate reference point to determine the true frequency.You can check the accuracy of the LOF in the LNB, for example, on:
View attachment 163053View attachment 163054View attachment 163055
You probably mean that you can compare to what is reported in the NIT? That is what neumodvb is doing, and how I ended up asking the question.You can check the accuracy of the LOF in the LNB, for example, on:
View attachment 163053View attachment 163054View attachment 163055
And Reuters has left the - 22W - building.It does look to be a mirror of the Reuters feed on SES4,.
There may be a new contract in place, or perhaps something important soon that cannot be reached on 22W.