Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
Which E2 receiver for best tuner sensitivity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="moonbase" data-source="post: 1063343" data-attributes="member: 178786"><p>About the T2-M1, I scanned 40.5W C band with Edision Nino Pro running an OpenATV image and it does not detect any of the T2-M1 channels correctly. Also, when scanning the transponders after the blind scan it did not lock any of the T2-M1 transponders. This was using a satellites.xml file I downloaded from your site and validated on the validation site.</p><p></p><p>With an OpenVIX image, the Edision Nino Pro correctly identifies the T2-M1 transponders on 40.5W C band but after a blind scan and transponder scan the receiver has to be rebooted otherwise it justs sits on any channel with a black screen. Even after a reboot, ther Nino Pro does not give a picture on any of the T2-M1 channels.</p><p></p><p>In my personal experience, the T2-M1 does not work on this receiver for the tests I have done so far. It seems to have problems. If anyone else has managed to get any of the T2-M1 channels from 40.5W .working with a Nino Pro I am happy to repeat my tests using their configuration of image and satellites.xml.</p><p></p><p>I have attached a few pictures of the scan I did from 40.5W in C band.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="moonbase, post: 1063343, member: 178786"] About the T2-M1, I scanned 40.5W C band with Edision Nino Pro running an OpenATV image and it does not detect any of the T2-M1 channels correctly. Also, when scanning the transponders after the blind scan it did not lock any of the T2-M1 transponders. This was using a satellites.xml file I downloaded from your site and validated on the validation site. With an OpenVIX image, the Edision Nino Pro correctly identifies the T2-M1 transponders on 40.5W C band but after a blind scan and transponder scan the receiver has to be rebooted otherwise it justs sits on any channel with a black screen. Even after a reboot, ther Nino Pro does not give a picture on any of the T2-M1 channels. In my personal experience, the T2-M1 does not work on this receiver for the tests I have done so far. It seems to have problems. If anyone else has managed to get any of the T2-M1 channels from 40.5W .working with a Nino Pro I am happy to repeat my tests using their configuration of image and satellites.xml. I have attached a few pictures of the scan I did from 40.5W in C band. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Linux Based Receivers
Linux Receivers General
Which E2 receiver for best tuner sensitivity?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top