Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Administration Section: Help, Rules, Information
Announcements and News
Worrying legal decision in NL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BarMoo" data-source="post: 211" data-attributes="member: 175089"><p>Dear All,</p><p></p><p>Late as usual.</p><p></p><p>Given the very nature of the case, I can only imagine that the lawyers acting for and on behave of Canal+ knew how to swing it (money to be lost=very good lawyers). The judge, in turn, seems to have ceded to the Canal+ argument.</p><p></p><p>Blank cards and programmers are not going to see the end of Canal+; albeit, one could argue that they should have (sic) invested in an encryption technology that was harder to crack; should update codes more often, etc. </p><p></p><p>In a similar, and already stated way, CD-ROM burners will not see the end of printed and purchased music. Daft, daft. Its like banning fertiliser - because bombs can be made of it ?</p><p></p><p>One hopes that that person goes for an appeal and that this ruling is overturned - as it should: as 2old said, the law hasn't exactly been consistant in this instance. More homework for judges in Holland, please.</p><p></p><p>Then again, the Dutch do seem to be a law unto themselves.</p><p></p><p>Have Fun,</p><p></p><p>Mark.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BarMoo, post: 211, member: 175089"] Dear All, Late as usual. Given the very nature of the case, I can only imagine that the lawyers acting for and on behave of Canal+ knew how to swing it (money to be lost=very good lawyers). The judge, in turn, seems to have ceded to the Canal+ argument. Blank cards and programmers are not going to see the end of Canal+; albeit, one could argue that they should have (sic) invested in an encryption technology that was harder to crack; should update codes more often, etc. In a similar, and already stated way, CD-ROM burners will not see the end of printed and purchased music. Daft, daft. Its like banning fertiliser - because bombs can be made of it ? One hopes that that person goes for an appeal and that this ruling is overturned - as it should: as 2old said, the law hasn't exactly been consistant in this instance. More homework for judges in Holland, please. Then again, the Dutch do seem to be a law unto themselves. Have Fun, Mark. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Administration Section: Help, Rules, Information
Announcements and News
Worrying legal decision in NL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top