Analoguesat said:
The next generation of 28E birds is 20 years away yet. By then the whole idea of satellite delivery might be looked upon as terrribly quaint
Anyway in even 5 years the whole idea of tv rights restricted by geography is going to seem ludicrous.
(Sound if soap box being pulled out)
Going off thread for a minute:
Yeah - the ridiculous thing about it is that I just like watching select stuff off the main British channels.
However, I happen not to be in the UK, so I am not supposed to receive these things.
But I'd happily pay for it on a subscription basis if I could get it over my fibre-to-the-home internet connection.
I'd even pay content producers (like the BBC) to receive what is otherwise free-to-air TV.
(I'll even go as far as to admit that I could probably be talked into NOT having a 180 cm dish in my back-yard if I could get the same things from a network connection).
Even with sat reception, I'm sure there's loads of people in Spain and southern Europe that would pay plentiful to watch select stuff (as they do today).
What really matters is the absolute amount of eyeballs for a given piece of content.
For the content providers, competition of delivery services should be a good thing, as you'd just get the content to as many eyeballs as possible of all of those who want to watch.
The more paths to the viewers, the more viewes, and the more money content providers would make!
I hope we have some swift "tear-down-the-walls" disruptive tech or services now on-line movie services are gaining.
...down from soap box, back on thread.