Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Comparison of 2.4m dishes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deepbluesky" data-source="post: 98730" data-attributes="member: 176074"><p>Likvid for me personally these are future plans, maybe if i will be lucky to find a landlord that is not mad about these BUDs - i find them pretty eh <img src="https://www.satellites.co.uk/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-shortname=":)" />. </p><p>But my question should represent all people down there that would like to go for a motorized C/KU System for which KU is 1st choice and the rest as i said a bonus. </p><p>Indeed 3m is not that much difference in size but the costs are. I don't think that there are so many people that would pay such a huge sum. The 2.4m limit from the greek telecommunications regulatories is just typical by the way. I am not aware of any case where somebody was forced to take the dish away. I only know from one person that got the permission form immediately from them, so this is not a problem at all. If you would see how many water heaters are up there and more illegal rooms built...</p><p></p><p>I understand that the 3m has a lower f/D and is deeper but i didn't now that it collects less thermal ground noise. Have i understood you well that this would be a problem only to satellites on lower elevation (<5°) in hot days and worse on KU Band ?</p><p></p><p>Since you haven't lost a word about the czech Uniband LNBF i must guess that you haven't tested it yet or am i wrong ? This one works only on dishes with an f/D of 0.34-0.44 as can be seen here: <a href="http://www.tel-satexp.cz/ml_3_spec.htm" target="_blank">http://www.tel-satexp.cz/ml_3_spec.htm</a></p><p></p><p>Surely a Seavey feed is the best of the best if installed correctly but does this perform so much better ?</p><p></p><p>Highend is great if you can afford it but for the mass of enthusiasts i think that a good system is also sufficient instead of getting any steel homemade dish with bigger diameter that focus is worse and a well made smaller one.</p><p></p><p>Seems you are no fan of the DH 2.4m. Or is it because of the higher f/D only ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deepbluesky, post: 98730, member: 176074"] Likvid for me personally these are future plans, maybe if i will be lucky to find a landlord that is not mad about these BUDs - i find them pretty eh :). But my question should represent all people down there that would like to go for a motorized C/KU System for which KU is 1st choice and the rest as i said a bonus. Indeed 3m is not that much difference in size but the costs are. I don't think that there are so many people that would pay such a huge sum. The 2.4m limit from the greek telecommunications regulatories is just typical by the way. I am not aware of any case where somebody was forced to take the dish away. I only know from one person that got the permission form immediately from them, so this is not a problem at all. If you would see how many water heaters are up there and more illegal rooms built... I understand that the 3m has a lower f/D and is deeper but i didn't now that it collects less thermal ground noise. Have i understood you well that this would be a problem only to satellites on lower elevation (<5°) in hot days and worse on KU Band ? Since you haven't lost a word about the czech Uniband LNBF i must guess that you haven't tested it yet or am i wrong ? This one works only on dishes with an f/D of 0.34-0.44 as can be seen here: [url]http://www.tel-satexp.cz/ml_3_spec.htm[/url] Surely a Seavey feed is the best of the best if installed correctly but does this perform so much better ? Highend is great if you can afford it but for the mass of enthusiasts i think that a good system is also sufficient instead of getting any steel homemade dish with bigger diameter that focus is worse and a well made smaller one. Seems you are no fan of the DH 2.4m. Or is it because of the higher f/D only ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Satellite TV receivers & systems support forums
DISH SETUP: Single sat, Multi-Sat & Motorised
Comparison of 2.4m dishes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top