Es´hailSat-2 on 25.8ish °E

O

oe7dbh

New Member
My Satellite Setup
extra
My Location
Pians
New satellite from the end of 2016

Code: 
http://www.oe7forum.at/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=40#p1371

LNB for receive this Transponder: DSCN8481x.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Caveat

Since the proposed amateur band transmissions on the new satellite are to be kept within the normal allocation frequencies of 10.450-10.500GHz, the local oscillators within this LNB would be unsuitable for use in the normal Ku band reception - 10.7-12.75GHz when used with any normal receiver.
 
Yes, with it is possible only a part of the normal TV band to receive, with manual frequency programing. LNB is specifically designed for the receiving of Ham Radio transponder.
 
Ooh lovely - I fancy having a go at receiving the amateur tv signals :)
 
What kind of dish sizes are we talking about for this satellite? Judging from the LNB it's for offset dishes so that's 1.8m and under but the footprint is pretty much global so that's going to dilute the signals.
 
E.webp
timo_w2s said:
What kind of dish sizes are we talking about for this satellite? Judging from the LNB it's for offset dishes so that's 1.8m and under but the footprint is pretty much global so that's going to dilute the signals.
Click to expand...

Many dishes above 1.8 are offset.
 
An amateur repeater covering half the planet, what could possibly go wrong with that idea :-rofl2
 
There will no doubt be something on the shelves before end 2016
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
This is the first time I've locked and watched the Es'hailsat promo on 11493 H,1500,4/5 at 25.8 E, using an SDR dongle.
It is good to know that the signal should be strong to use and receive a TV/radio program using a dongle, especially for TV services.
 

Attachments

  • 26.0E_11491 H_QARS_2023-02-01_12-15-56.png
    26.0E_11491 H_QARS_2023-02-01_12-15-56.png
    639.7 KB · Views: 16
  • 26.0E_740.596 H_2023-02-01_12-10-29.png
    26.0E_740.596 H_2023-02-01_12-10-29.png
    685.3 KB · Views: 14
  • 25.9E_11470-10505 h_2023-02-01_12-35-34.png
    25.9E_11470-10505 h_2023-02-01_12-35-34.png
    38.8 KB · Views: 13
Can an admin or moderator please change the title of this topic to present the correct orbital position of Es'hail-2 ?
It is located at 25.8 East and not 25.5 East as currently displayed in the title.

Es'hail-1 is at 25.5 East.


Thank you
 
moonbase said:
Can an admin or moderator please change the title of this topic to present the correct orbital position of Es'hail-2 ?
It is located at 25.8 East and not 25.5 East as currently displayed in the title.

Es'hail-1 is at 25.5 East.


Thank you
Click to expand...
Es'hail 1 is slightly closer to Es2 at 25.55 E, or thereabouts, annoyingly the GTCombo does not have a second decimal point to give an accurate position so I've had to peak using the DiSEqC 1.2 fine tune for this satellite slot
 
Channel Hopper said:
Es'hail 1 is slightly closer to Es2 at 25.55 E, or thereabouts, annoyingly the GTCombo does not have a second decimal point to give an accurate position so I've had to peak using the DiSEqC 1.2 fine tune for this satellite slot
Click to expand...


Current 170 hour tracking data at the time of typing this message gives the approximate minimum gap between Es'hail-1 and Es'hail-2 at 0.26 degrees.
I suppose you could align the hourly intervals in a spreadsheet and get the co-aligned time orbital slot gap for a more accurate figure?


Lists below taken using London as approximate geographic location.

ES'HAIL 2 25.824 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data

ES'HAIL 2 25.824 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data
www.satellite-calculations.com

ES'HAIL 1 25.529 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data

ES'HAIL 1 25.529 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data
www.satellite-calculations.com

From a UK located DX'ers persepective, the Es'hail-1 orbital location position is pretty much an irrelevance, hardly anyone outside of commercial teleport stations or broadcasters can receive it.
 
Last edited:
moonbase said:
Current 170 hour tracking data at the time of typing this message gives the approximate minimum gap between Es'hail-1 and Es'hail-2 at 0.26 degrees.
I suppose you could align the hourly intervals in a spreadsheet and get the co-aligned time orbital slot gap for a more accurate figure?


Lists below taken using London as approximate geographic location.

ES'HAIL 2 25.824 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data

ES'HAIL 2 25.824 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data
www.satellite-calculations.com

ES'HAIL 1 25.529 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data

ES'HAIL 1 25.529 East 170 hour predicted satellite tracking data
www.satellite-calculations.com

From a UK located DX'ers persepective, the Es'hail-1 orbital location position is pretty much an irrelevance, hardly anyone outside of commercial teleport stations or broadcasters can receive it.
Click to expand...
This is not a UK located DX'ers forum.
 
Channel Hopper said:
This is not a UK located DX'ers forum.
Click to expand...


I did not say it was.

My comment was referring to the fact that for a UK located hobbyist DX'er the Es'hail-1 satellite is pretty much an irrelevance.
As satellite reception is location dependent, I think it is useful to qualify it with location information. Otherwise, fringe reception reports become meaningless.
 
moonbase said:
I did not say it was.

My comment was referring to the fact that for a UK located hobbyist DX'er the Es'hail-1 satellite is pretty much an irrelevance.
As satellite reception is location dependent, I think it is useful to qualify it with location information. Otherwise, fringe reception reports become meaningless.
Click to expand...
Satesco is based in Romania, unless he has not updated his profile. The footprint margins are not so different.

Es´hailSat-2 on 25.8ish °E

New satellite from the end of 2016 http://www.oe7forum.at/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=40#p1371 LNB for receive this Transponder:
www.satellites.co.uk www.satellites.co.uk

(Assuming gender...... tut tut )
 
Back
Top