- Joined
- Jan 1, 2000
- Messages
- 35,613
- Reaction score
- 8,581
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 59
- Website
- www.sat-elite.uk
- My Satellite Setup
- A little less analogue, and a lot more crap.
- My Location
- UK
Vipersan said:I totally understand what you're saying CH ..
..and I realise there would be many technical difficulties to overcome ..
Sadly the main reason for not doing a thing is usually 'economic' in nature ..
..but what price do you put on a sick population ..and unuseable environment or landmass for many decades ...
Economics really doesn't come into the equation, or the health of the world population.
The use of DU in munitions is controversial because of questions about potential long-term health effects.[4][5] Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because uranium is a toxic metal.[6] It is weakly radioactive and remains so because of its long physical half-life (4.468 billion years for uranium-238). The biological half-life (the average time it takes for the human body to eliminate half the amount in the body) for uranium is about 15 days.[7] The aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the impact sites leading to possible inhalation by human beings.[8] During a three week period of conflict in 2003 in Iraq, 1,000 to 2,000 tonnes of DU munitions were used.[9]
The chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is about a million times greater in vitro than its radiological hazard
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium
The aggregate industry has also developed Ducrete, or depleted Uranium concrete, which will be making it's way into various buildings around the world soon.