zorba said:
Obviously different rules for different countries. How does attenuating a 2D transponder help? We need to boost as much as we can for 2D over here.
I've been thinking about this.
Something that's of great significance in this area is cross polar rejection. We have wildly differing reception conditions for the different Astra2 satellites.
In particular, the north beam transponders can be swamped by adjacent south beam and, to a lesser extent, 2D horizontals can be swamped by their vertical neighbours.
This leads to an odd situation with certain north beam transponders in that bigger isn't better. If all you wanted was to receive channel 4 24x7, you'd need a 1,5m dish and all would be fine. But most people have a 2,4m dish to get 2D. This actually
degrades reception of C4. With my 3,1m dish, if I optimise for 2D I lose C4 for a couple of hours in the afternoon.
This is obviously due to the very powerful adjacent south beam transponders. These can be received with a 50cm dish here, so with a 3,1m they must be strong almost to the point of being
too strong.
With 2D, the difference in strength between horizontal and vertical transponders is considerable. A 2,4m dish will get the verticals 24x7; with luck it will get the horizontals 12 hours a day.
When the attenuator is adjusted, then either 10773H (BBC2) or 12168V (Channel 4) is used as the test transponder. It can only be that the attenuator is minimising cross polar rejection.
I'm not 100% convinced about the role of the attenuator, but some installers use one as a matter of routine, and I couldn't see them doing so unless they thought it beneficial.