Advice Needed Receivers with the lowest Symbol Rate?

The IF frequency is unrelated to Symbol Rate.
If someone has managed to tune to the 25.5E amateur band with TBS5520 and an unmodified LNB, then probably the Silabs tuners on E2 receivers will too.

BTW, I made a low SR test with the Availink tuner of my OSmio4K. I tuned to the Polish radios on 39E on 11479H SR1000 via the Satfinder. The frequency is tuned with no problem (just a slight delay which is normal in this case). Once I input SR 999 which in any other tuner would also tune the frequency the signal is completely gone.
This is to prove beyond any doubt that the SR1000 limitation is simply defined in the firmware and not the hardware of the tuner. It should be reported to Edision immediately.
 
MCelliotG said:
The IF frequency is unrelated to Symbol Rate.
If someone has managed to tune to the 25.5E amateur band with TBS5520 and an unmodified LNB, then probably the Silabs tuners on E2 receivers will too.

BTW, I made a low SR test with the Availink tuner of my OSmio4K. I tuned to the Polish radios on 39E on 11479H SR1000 via the Satfinder. The frequency is tuned with no problem (just a slight delay which is normal in this case). Once I input SR 999 which in any other tuner would also tune the frequency the signal is completely gone.
This is to prove beyond any doubt that the SR1000 limitation is simply defined in the firmware and not the hardware of the tuner. It should be reported to Edision immediately.
Click to expand...
I know SR is unrelated, but it would be nice that a tuner can tune outside of domestic sat bands and capable of resolving low SR's as well.
Some must be able to, is there a limit in E2?
 
I don't think so, once the tuner is capable, this band should be receivable.
 
I am currently running a very cheap (ie, free from a skip) LNB for my tests with the SF8008. I'm almost certain it is a DRO type but those with knowledge of the make could correct this. I have been pleasantly surprised the system on the roof has been giving excellent low s/r response without more playing about.

Since the skip retrieval liberated a boom arm with 9 degree spacer, I have spare one of the same type and if I am feeling better will have a go tomorrow to twist a small screw inside to see if it will bring in the Es'Hail stuff without complaint.20190417_115939.webp
 
Channel Hopper said:
I am currently running a very cheap (ie, free from a skip) LNB for my tests with the SF8008. I'm almost certain it is a DRO type but those with knowledge of the make could correct this. I have been pleasantly surprised the system on the roof has been giving excellent low s/r response without more playing about.

Since the skip retrieval liberated a boom arm with 9 degree spacer, I have spare one of the same type and if I am feeling better will have a go tomorrow to twist a small screw inside to see if it will bring in the Es'Hail stuff without complaint.View attachment 124024
Click to expand...
"Made for England" :-rofl2
 
I cannot find that make/model anywhere online, but from the serial number - and condition - I assume its around nine years old.
 
The question is how we could make this work with an unmodified LNB.
For instance what frequency do you input to get the transmissions, their actual or a modified one?
 
I wonder if someone might still have an old Global ADX plus lying around somewhere? Might do the trick on receivers whose tuner doesn't go below 950MHz.
 
MCelliotG said:
The question is how we could make this work with an unmodified LNB.
For instance what frequency do you input to get the transmissions, their actual or a modified one?
Click to expand...


The user interface calculation is a simple one: local oscillator + IF = downink frequency, therefore there are two options. Adjust the local oscillator, or play with the IF, the second option is strictly within the realm of the receiver software developing team

Even with the other LO options within the menus of the receivers I have to hand (universal, 10750, 5150 or 11300), the lowest available incoming frequency that could be received without playing around with the LNB internals is 950MHz.

I am guessing here, but potentially adding one further LO within the receiver's LNB setup menu, 10250MHz (with 22kHz tone disabled) might force the receiver to start any seach for channels 500MHz below 10700MHz, but feedback from the tuner/demod section may throw up a 'does not compute' error.

The Elanvision receiver used by the family does have the option of adding custom LOs but only within the second section of a dual LNB setup, the first being fixed at 9750, which automatically disables the 22kHz tone for a universal installed outside. To prevent the receiver having a conflict with the two LOs, I woul set the first to a completely different band, ie 5150MHz and use just the second for checking the amateur band.

I can't remember offhand what the lowest frequency is from Es'Hail but 10450MHz appears in documentation with 10495 MHz DVB broadcasts mentioned on various sites with an 8MHz transponder, forcing the onscreen LO down 300MHz to 10050 is all that is required to kick things off.

The avoided - issue is the upper band is then locked to horizontal only (by virtue of older dual band LNBs using 18V to access the higher frequencies), but this is perfect for the Es'Hail2 payload.

You'll thank me in the morning20190418_084244.webp20190418_092118.webp20190418_110921.webp20190418_112518.webp20190418_112518.webp
 
Last edited:
For those with a better receiver than the Elanvision here is the sort of menu to play with, and the parameters I would set.20190418_114827.webp
 
Channel Hopper said:
For those with a better receiver than the Elanvision here is the sort of menu to play with, and the parameters I would set.View attachment 124029
Click to expand...
Tried this on my Mutant a while back but wouldn't have any of it. So either the software or the tuner is limiting it tuning below 950MHz
 
Others on here are saying that a 1.2m is about the smallest dish you can get away with (that plus a very stablle LN:cool:.

Having just powered down the SF8008 and tried again, the blind scan is working, and in running up the transponder search with the modified Local oscillator settings I have a number of results (at the correct lower frequencies according to Lyngsat) on a Hispasat search, so at least the set up menus are doing the correct calculations for frequency.20190418_135555.webp
 
Channel Hopper said:
Others on here are saying that a 1.2m is about the smallest dish you can get away with (that plus a very stablle LN:cool:.

Having just powered down the SF8008 and tried again, the blind scan is working, and in running up the transponder search with the modified Local oscillator settings I have a number of results (at the correct lower frequencies according to Lyngsat) on a Hispasat search, so at least the set up menus are doing the correct calculations for frequency.View attachment 124031
Click to expand...
Some are using Zone2 dishes with success.
 
Fisty McB said:
I wonder if someone might still have an old Global ADX plus lying around somewhere? Might do the trick on receivers whose tuner doesn't go below 950MHz.
Click to expand...
Threw my old one out a couple of years ago - but there's one on ebay ATM if anyone wants to try with it.
 
jeallen01 said:
Threw my old one out a couple of years ago - but there's one on ebay ATM if anyone wants to try with it.
Click to expand...
Been following that eBay auction. It ended up being sold for £50! :-wow

Not bad for something likely around 25 years old that Sky subscribers could purchase from them for a tenner back in 1995/96!
 
Fisty McB said:
Been following that eBay auction. It ended up being sold for £50! :-wow

Not bad for something likely around 25 years old that Sky subscribers could purchase from them for a tenner back in 1995/96!
Click to expand...

Have to dig mine out then, knowing my luck, mine would sell for 99p!
 
scopus said:
Have to dig mine out then, knowing my luck, mine would sell for 99p!
Click to expand...
I'd kept a curious eye on it, if there was little interest I might have gone to around £7 or £8 of a bid once postage was factored in. Got an alert at around 11 o'clock this morning that the bidding had went up to over £20 and that was the trigger for me to say "f*ck that!" Looks like there were three keen bidders with one deciding going above £26 wasn't worth it and the other two being very keen to the point of being will to pay at least £50 for it. As Fr. Dougal Maguire would say, "It's mad Ted!" I'd hazard a guess that the seller doesn't understand the fuss and can't believe what they got for it.
 
I'm really curious about the E2 based boxes, looking at lots of datasheets and schematics for various NIMS, Demods, Tuners etc a lot will go well outside the normal domestic IF range.

I wonder how easy it would be to change this software limitation, surely it's something inside E2 or the tuner drivers that could be modified?
 
Back
Top