- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 5,604
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 58
- My Satellite Setup
- Some SAT-related hardware.
- My Location
- N-E from Riga
OK, as I got more or less enough 120cm antennas I am going to perform some tests of them this year. Only plastic dishes will participate in this competition, I also have couple of 120cm metal dishes, but, most likely will not add them to this test.
#1 - CM120;
#2- NSC 120 (Made in West Germany, means quiet old one);
#3 - Cēsu 120 (Latvian product);
#4- Visiosat 120 (hope to have it this week);
And maybe also #5 Echostar 120 (if I manage to find one at all).
So, my testing steps will be:
1 - String test them to make sure they are not warped (warped ones will be excluded from tests);
2- perform exact measurements of dishes, if possible, calculate their offset angles, opening angles, Focal points, "Le point G";
3- check whether original feedarms hold LNB in proper place and LNB is pointed to the right spot on the surface of the dish. Laser-pointer will be used to check aiming of LNB.
4- will install IBU in original LNB holder on original feedarms and point antennas (one by one) to satellite which has variety of transponders across whole frequency range, and where are weak and strong signals. And is better this satellite is on the top of the arc. I think that will be 28,2*E
5- Will scan all frequencies and record signal levels to use this data for future comparison.
6- If original feedarms are not holding LNB in the right place than will probably make new feedarms and do scanning again.
7- if have enough time than install different subreflectors to dishes and record data again;
7- after all test are done and all data in the spreadsheet, will draw some conclusions and say which system perform better and also how much better it performed.
That is the plan. As we know, not all the plans are executable and they can be changed immediately after start, but, anyway it is better to have bad plan than do not have any
O, yea, critics and ideas are very welcome!
Test "rabbits"
#1 - CM120;
#2- NSC 120 (Made in West Germany, means quiet old one);
#3 - Cēsu 120 (Latvian product);
#4- Visiosat 120 (hope to have it this week);
And maybe also #5 Echostar 120 (if I manage to find one at all).
So, my testing steps will be:
1 - String test them to make sure they are not warped (warped ones will be excluded from tests);
2- perform exact measurements of dishes, if possible, calculate their offset angles, opening angles, Focal points, "Le point G";
3- check whether original feedarms hold LNB in proper place and LNB is pointed to the right spot on the surface of the dish. Laser-pointer will be used to check aiming of LNB.
4- will install IBU in original LNB holder on original feedarms and point antennas (one by one) to satellite which has variety of transponders across whole frequency range, and where are weak and strong signals. And is better this satellite is on the top of the arc. I think that will be 28,2*E
5- Will scan all frequencies and record signal levels to use this data for future comparison.
6- If original feedarms are not holding LNB in the right place than will probably make new feedarms and do scanning again.
7- if have enough time than install different subreflectors to dishes and record data again;
7- after all test are done and all data in the spreadsheet, will draw some conclusions and say which system perform better and also how much better it performed.
That is the plan. As we know, not all the plans are executable and they can be changed immediately after start, but, anyway it is better to have bad plan than do not have any
O, yea, critics and ideas are very welcome!
Test "rabbits"
Attachments
Last edited: