Log in
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Topics
Pictures of Members' Setups and general satellite
TRIAX TD88 vs FRACARRO PENTA 85
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satkitten" data-source="post: 566649" data-attributes="member: 284280"><p>i see the fracarro 0.5 lnb is a better shape for the lnb holder than the strong...so should be able to push in a bit more !</p><p></p><p>also lookingin into a smart titanium second edition!! but reading the post here</p><p><a href="http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/dish-setup-single-sat-multi-sat-motorised-systems/134217-results-andrew-c120-feedhorn-vs-smart-titanium-lnb-f.html" target="_blank">http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/dish-setup-single-sat-multi-sat-motorised-systems/134217-results-andrew-c120-feedhorn-vs-smart-titanium-lnb-f.html</a></p><p></p><p>post #8...i see the lidl is alledged to be better!! lol maybe ill just mod the lnb holder instead....although i really cant get my head around this noise factor.....when my 0.6 silvercrest (lidl) lnb is way better than the strong 0.2.......might just slacken everything off on the dish and realign with the lidl lnb.....</p><p></p><p><strong>LIDL LNB = </strong></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong>SilverCrest Universal Single LNB, model IP 401<span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'">. </span></strong></span><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong> Suitable for standard offset satellite dish with 40mm holder. </strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong>Low band: 10.70-11.70 GHz</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong>High band: 11.70-12.75 GHz</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong>Noise factor: 0.6dB</strong></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><strong>Amplification: 55dB</strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satkitten, post: 566649, member: 284280"] i see the fracarro 0.5 lnb is a better shape for the lnb holder than the strong...so should be able to push in a bit more ! also lookingin into a smart titanium second edition!! but reading the post here [URL]http://www.satellites.co.uk/satellite/dish-setup-single-sat-multi-sat-motorised-systems/134217-results-andrew-c120-feedhorn-vs-smart-titanium-lnb-f.html[/URL] post #8...i see the lidl is alledged to be better!! lol maybe ill just mod the lnb holder instead....although i really cant get my head around this noise factor.....when my 0.6 silvercrest (lidl) lnb is way better than the strong 0.2.......might just slacken everything off on the dish and realign with the lidl lnb..... [B]LIDL LNB = [/B] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][B]SilverCrest Universal Single LNB, model IP 401[FONT=Comic Sans MS]. [/FONT][/B][/FONT][FONT=Comic Sans MS][B] Suitable for standard offset satellite dish with 40mm holder. Low band: 10.70-11.70 GHz High band: 11.70-12.75 GHz Noise factor: 0.6dB Amplification: 55dB[/B][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Topics
Pictures of Members' Setups and general satellite
TRIAX TD88 vs FRACARRO PENTA 85
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top